\relax 
\citation{Vallee:2002}
\citation{Adloff:1998aw}
\citation{Abt:1997hi}
\citation{Abe:2001cv}
\citation{Ishikawa:1993qr}
\citation{Arteaga-Romero:1991wn}
\citation{Baranov:1991yq}
\citation{Vermaseren:1983cz}
\citation{List:1993}
\citation{Ingelman:1997mv}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{1}}
\newlabel{fig:feynman:bh}{{1}{1}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Muon pair production in the two-photon process (here for the deep inelastic case).}}{1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Selection}{1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Inclusive Isolated Muon Pair Production}{1}}
\citation{Adloff:2002re}
\citation{Vallee:2002}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Elastic and Inelastic Muon Pair Production}{2}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Summary}{2}}
\bibcite{Vallee:2002}{1}
\bibcite{Adloff:1998aw}{2}
\bibcite{Abt:1997hi}{3}
\bibcite{Abe:2001cv}{4}
\bibcite{Ishikawa:1993qr}{5}
\bibcite{Arteaga-Romero:1991wn}{6}
\bibcite{Baranov:1991yq}{7}
\bibcite{Vermaseren:1983cz}{8}
\bibcite{List:1993}{9}
\bibcite{Ingelman:1997mv}{10}
\bibcite{Adloff:2002re}{11}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Invariant di-muon mass in comparison to the electroweak (EW) prediction using GRAPE. The contribution of the most important electroweak muon pair production processes are also plotted individually, i.e. the contribution from the two photon process $\gamma \gamma \rightarrow \mu \mu $ (using LPAIR) and $Z^{0}$-resonance. The contribution of additional sources of muon pair production are $\gamma \gamma \DOTSB \relbar \joinrel \rightarrow \tau \tau $, boson-gluon fusion ($c\mathaccentV {bar}016{c}$ and $b\mathaccentV {bar}016{b}$) and the decay of the $\Upsilon $ resonances. Also shown is the relative difference between data and all Standard Model contributions (lower figures). The inner error bars represent the statistical errors. The outer error bars represent the statistical and systematical errors added in quadrature.}}{4}}
\newlabel{fig:invariantmass}{{2}{4}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Cross section as a function of the muon transverse momenta (with two entries in the cross section per muon). For details see figure 2\hbox {}. }}{5}}
\newlabel{fig:pt}{{3}{5}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Cross section as a function of the hadronic transverse momentum. For details see figure 2\hbox {}.}}{6}}
\newlabel{fig:ptx}{{4}{6}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Cross section as a function of the invariant mass of the $\gamma $-proton system for di-muon events. For details see figure 2\hbox {}. }}{7}}
\newlabel{fig:wgammap}{{5}{7}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Distribution of the missing transverse momentum uncorrected for detector resolution. The data are compared to the full standard model expectation (SM), which is dominated by the diagrams simulated with the GRAPE Monte Carlo.}}{8}}
\newlabel{fig:ptmiss}{{6}{8}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Cross section as a function of the invariant mass of elastically produced muon pairs.}}{9}}
\newlabel{fig:ewcrosssectionsela}{{7}{9}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Cross section as a function of the invariant mass of inelastically produced muon pairs.}}{10}}
\newlabel{fig:ewcrosssectionsine}{{8}{10}}