\relax 
\citation{Collins_pom}
\citation{BLJK2}
\citation{H1_F2D3_prel}
\citation{Collins_pom}
\citation{Adloff:2001wr}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{1}}
\newlabel{section:introduction}{{1}{1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Kinematics}{1}}
\newlabel{section:kinematics}{{2}{1}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces  \em  The process under study in this article is $ep \rightarrow eXY \rightarrow e(D^{*\pm }X')Y$. The electron ($e$) couples to a photon ($\gamma ^{\star }$) which interacts with the proton ($p$) via a color singlet exchange, producing two distinct final state hadronic systems $X$ and $Y$. The systems $X$ and $Y$ are separated by the largest gap in rapidity between the final state hadrons.}}{2}}
\newlabel{kinefig}{{1}{2}}
\newlabel{xpomtbeta}{{1}{2}}
\newlabel{zpom}{{2}{2}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Experimental aspects and data analysis}{2}}
\newlabel{section:experiment}{{3}{2}}
\citation{H1:det}
\citation{spacal}
\citation{fscomb}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}The H1 Detector}{3}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Event Selection}{3}}
\citation{Adloff:2001wr}
\citation{pdg2004}
\citation{RAPGAP,RAPGAP208}
\citation{DIFFVM,DIFFVM2}
\newlabel{xpomandbeta}{{3}{4}}
\newlabel{zpomdstar}{{4}{4}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.3}\relax \mathversion  {bold}$D^*$ identification}{4}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Cross Section determination and systematic errors}{4}}
\newlabel{section:xsection}{{4}{4}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces  \em  Distribution of the mass difference $\Delta M=M(K^{\mp } \pi ^{\pm } \pi _{slow}^{\pm })-M(K^{\mp }\pi ^{\pm })$. The fitted curve is of the form $a(\Delta M - m_{\pi })^b (1- c\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} (\Delta M)^2 ) +$ Gaussian function for the signal.}}{5}}
\newlabel{deltam}{{2}{5}}
\citation{jetset}
\citation{Adloff:2001wr}
\citation{ZEUS-diffcharm04}
\citation{RAPGAP,RAPGAP208}
\citation{H1_F2D3_prel}
\citation{hvqdis,hvqdiff}
\citation{H1_F2D3_prel}
\citation{RAPGAP,RAPGAP208}
\citation{H1_F2D3_prel}
\citation{hvqdis,hvqdiff}
\citation{H1_F2D3_prel}
\citation{RAPGAP,RAPGAP208}
\citation{jung-dis03}
\citation{BLJK1,Bartels_qqga,BLJK2}
\citation{H1_F2D3_prel}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Results}{6}}
\newlabel{section:results}{{5}{6}}
\citation{hvqdis,hvqdiff}
\citation{RAPGAP,RAPGAP208}
\citation{jetset}
\citation{H1_F2D3_prel}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces \em  Predictions of different calculations for the total diffractive $D^{*\pm }$ cross section in the kinematic regions $x_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}} < 0.04\tmspace  +\thickmuskip {.2777em}$ and $x_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}} < 0.01\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}$ compared with the measured cross sections.}}{7}}
\newlabel{table:model}{{1}{7}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}Comparisons with calculations}{7}}
\citation{BLJK1,Bartels_qqga,BLJK2}
\citation{jung-dis03}
\citation{hvqdis,hvqdiff}
\citation{RAPGAP,RAPGAP208}
\citation{ZEUS-diffcharm04}
\citation{RAPGAP,RAPGAP208}
\citation{hvqdis,hvqdiff}
\citation{BLJK1,Bartels_qqga,BLJK2}
\citation{jung-dis03}
\citation{Aktas:2003ja}
\citation{Adloff:2001wr}
\citation{Adloff:2001wr}
\citation{ZEUS-diffcharm04}
\citation{h1_diff_dijets,h1_diff_dijets_eps03,h1_diff_dijets_ichep04}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}Differential cross sections}{8}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Measurements for \relax \mathversion  {bold}$x_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}<0.04$:}{8}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Measurements for \relax \mathversion  {bold}$x_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}<0.01$:}{8}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Conclusion}{9}}
\newlabel{section:conclusion}{{6}{9}}
\bibstyle{mysty}
\bibdata{ref}
\bibcite{Collins_pom}{1}
\bibcite{BLJK2}{2}
\bibcite{H1_F2D3_prel}{3}
\bibcite{Adloff:2001wr}{4}
\bibcite{H1:det}{5}
\bibcite{spacal}{6}
\bibcite{fscomb}{7}
\bibcite{pdg2004}{8}
\bibcite{RAPGAP}{9}
\bibcite{RAPGAP208}{10}
\bibcite{DIFFVM}{11}
\bibcite{DIFFVM2}{12}
\bibcite{jetset}{13}
\bibcite{ZEUS-diffcharm04}{14}
\bibcite{hvqdis}{15}
\bibcite{hvqdiff}{16}
\bibcite{jung-dis03}{17}
\bibcite{BLJK1}{18}
\bibcite{Bartels_qqga}{19}
\bibcite{Aktas:2003ja}{20}
\bibcite{h1_diff_dijets}{21}
\bibcite{h1_diff_dijets_eps03}{22}
\bibcite{h1_diff_dijets_ichep04}{23}
\citation{hvqdis,hvqdiff}
\citation{H1_F2D3_prel}
\citation{hvqdis,hvqdiff}
\citation{H1_F2D3_prel}
\citation{hvqdis,hvqdiff}
\citation{H1_F2D3_prel}
\citation{hvqdis,hvqdiff}
\citation{H1_F2D3_prel}
\citation{hvqdis,hvqdiff}
\citation{H1_F2D3_prel}
\citation{hvqdis,hvqdiff}
\citation{H1_F2D3_prel}
\citation{hvqdis,hvqdiff}
\citation{H1_F2D3_prel}
\citation{ZEUS-diffcharm04}
\citation{hvqdis,hvqdiff}
\citation{H1_F2D3_prel}
\citation{ZEUS-diffcharm04}
\citation{hvqdis,hvqdiff}
\citation{H1_F2D3_prel}
\citation{BLJK1,Bartels_qqga,BLJK2}
\citation{jung-dis03}
\citation{hvqdis,hvqdiff}
\citation{H1_F2D3_prel}
\citation{BLJK1,Bartels_qqga,BLJK2}
\citation{jung-dis03}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces \em  Differential cross sections for $D^*$ meson production in diffractive DIS, shown as a function of a) $\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}z_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$, an estimator for the longitudinal momentum fraction of the diffractive exchange entering the hard process, b) $\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}x_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$, the longitudinal proton momentum fraction taken by the diffractive exchange and c) $\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}\beta $, an estimator for the longitudinal momentum fraction of the diffractive exchange carried by the struck quark. All cross sections represent the average value over the corresponding bin. The data are shown as points with error bars (inner: statistical, outer: total). They are compared with a next-to-leading order QCD calculation as implemented in a diffractive version of the program HVQDIS\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {hvqdis,hvqdiff}, using the NLO diffractive parton distributions from \cite  {H1_F2D3_prel}. The nominal predictions are shown as the central lines of the error bands. The inner error band represents the renormalization scale uncertainty, while the outer error band shows the total uncertainty, which includes variations of the charm mass in the range $m_c=1.35 \ldots  1.65 \rm  \ GeV$ and of the parameter of the Peterson fragmentation function $\epsilon =0.035 \ldots  0.100$, added in quadrature. }}{12}}
\newlabel{fig:betaxpomzpom}{{3}{12}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces \em  Differential cross sections for $D^*$ meson production in diffractive DIS, shown as a function of a) the photon virtuality $Q^2$, b) the inelasticity $y$, c) the transverse momentum $p_{T, D^*}$ and d) the pseudorapitdy $\eta _{D^*}$ of the $D^{*\pm }$ meson. All cross sections represent the average value over the corresponding bin. The data are shown as points with error bars (inner: statistical, outer: total). They are compared with a next-to-leading order QCD calculation\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {hvqdis,hvqdiff}, using the NLO diffractive parton distributions from\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {H1_F2D3_prel}. The nominal predictions are shown as the central lines of the error bands. For details see Fig.\nobreakspace  {}\ref {fig:betaxpomzpom}. }}{13}}
\newlabel{fig:q2ptgpeta}{{4}{13}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces  \em  Differential cross sections for $D^*$ meson production in diffractive DIS, shown as a function of $x_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$, the longitudinal proton momentum fraction taken by the diffractive exchange. All cross sections represent the average value over the corresponding bin. The data are shown as points with error bars (inner: statistical, outer: total). They are compared with a next-to-leading order QCD calculation\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {hvqdis,hvqdiff}, using the NLO diffractive parton distributions from\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {H1_F2D3_prel}. For details see Fig.\nobreakspace  {}\ref {fig:betaxpomzpom}. Also shown are predictions obtained with the LO hadron level Monte Carlo event generator {\sc  Rapgap}\ (dot-dashed curve). }}{14}}
\newlabel{fig:xpomNLORG}{{5}{14}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces \em  Differential cross section for $D^*$ meson production in diffractive DIS, shown as a function of the transverse momentum $p_{T,D^*}$. All cross sections represent the average value over the corresponding bin. The data are shown as points with error bars (inner: statistical, outer: total). They are compared with a next-to-leading order QCD calculation\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {hvqdis,hvqdiff}, using the NLO diffractive parton distributions from\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {H1_F2D3_prel}. For details see Fig.\nobreakspace  {}\ref {fig:betaxpomzpom}. Also shown is the measurement from ZEUS\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {ZEUS-diffcharm04}, rescaled to the phase space region investigated here. For this comparison the binning has been changed. The data points of the ZEUS measurement are slightly displaced for visibility. }}{15}}
\newlabel{fig:ptZEUS}{{6}{15}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces \em  Differential cross sections for $D^*$ meson production in diffractive DIS, in the restricted kinematic region $x_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}<0.01$, shown as a function of a) $\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}z_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$, an estimator for the longitudinal momentum fraction of the diffractive exchange entering the hard process, b) $\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}x_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$, the longitudinal proton momentum fraction taken by the diffractive exchange, c) the transverse momentum $p_{T, D^*}$ and d) the pseudorapitdy $\eta _{D^*}$ of the $D^{*\pm }$ meson. All cross sections represent the average value over the corresponding bin. The data are shown as points with error bars (inner: statistical, outer: total). They are compared with a next-to-leading order QCD calculation\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {hvqdis,hvqdiff}, using the NLO diffractive parton distributions from\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {H1_F2D3_prel}. The nominal predictions are shown as the central lines of the error bands. For details see Fig.\nobreakspace  {}\ref {fig:betaxpomzpom}. Also shown is a prediction from the perturbative 2-gluon approach of {\it  BJKLW}\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {BLJK1,Bartels_qqga,BLJK2} using the un-integrated gluon density obtained from a fit assuming CCFM evolution to the inclusive structure function $F_2$\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {jung-dis03} with a cut of $p_{T}>1.5 \tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} {\rm  GeV}$ for the gluon in the $c\mathaccentV {bar}016{c} g$ process (dot-dashed curve). }}{16}}
\newlabel{fig:xpomlt0.01}{{7}{16}}