\relax 
\citation{deth1}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Experimental apparatus}{1}}
\newlabel{det}{{2}{1}}
\citation{jetalgkt}
\citation{jb}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Analysis method}{2}}
\newlabel{analysis}{{3}{2}}
\citation{pythia}
\citation{herwig}
\citation{geant}
\citation{lund}
\citation{jetset}
\citation{cluster}
\citation{grv}
\citation{nlo}
\citation{cteq5m}
\citation{grv}
\citation{afgho}
\citation{gsgho}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces  Transverse energy flow integrated over $|\Delta \eta | \leq 1$ around the jet axis as a function of $\Delta \phi $ in different ranges of pseudorapidity and jet transverse energy. }}{4}}
\newlabel{fig:profile_phi}{{1}{4}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Results}{4}}
\newlabel{results}{{4}{4}}
\citation{zeuset}
\citation{zeusrp}
\citation{cone}
\bibcite{deth1}{1}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Summary}{6}}
\bibcite{jetalgkt}{2}
\bibcite{jb}{3}
\bibcite{pythia}{4}
\bibcite{herwig}{5}
\bibcite{geant}{6}
\bibcite{grv}{7}
\bibcite{lund}{8}
\bibcite{jetset}{9}
\bibcite{cluster}{10}
\bibcite{zeuset}{11}
\bibcite{cone}{12}
\bibcite{zeusrp}{13}
\bibcite{nlo}{14}
\bibcite{cteq5m}{15}
\bibcite{afgho}{16}
\bibcite{gsgho}{17}
\citation{zeuset}
\citation{zeuset}
\citation{zeusrp}
\citation{zeusrp}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces  The measured differential $e^+ p$ cross-section $d\sigma / dE_T^{jet}$ for inclusive jet production using the inclusive $k_T$ algorithm integrated over $-1 \leq \eta ^{jet} \leq 2.5$ in the kinematic region defined by $Q^2 \leq 1\nobreakspace  {}\@mathrm {GeV}^2$ and $0.1 \leq y \leq 0.9$. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors of the data, and the outer show the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. Data are compared with QCD calculations using GRV-HO photon parton distributions and CTEQ5M proton parton distributions. The LO and NLO predictions are shown as dotted and dashed lines respectively. The full line indicates the NLO predictions with hadronisation corrections. The renormalisation and factorisation scales are defined by $\mu _R = \mu _F = \DOTSB \sum@ \slimits@ E_T/2$. The hatched band displays the uncertainty on the NLO QCD predictions obtained by varying the renormalisation and factorisation scales by a factor of 2 up and down. }}{8}}
\newlabel{fig:xsec_hiet_1}{{2}{8}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces  The relative difference between the measured differential $e^+ p$ cross-section $d\sigma /dE_T^{jet}$ for inclusive jet production using the inclusive $k_T$ algo rithm integrated over $-1 \leq \eta ^{jet} \leq 2.5$ in the kinematic region defined by $Q^2 \leq 1\nobreakspace  {}\@mathrm {GeV}^2$ and $0.1 \leq y \leq 0.9$, and the NLO calculation based on GRV-HO and CTEQ5M parameterisations of the photon and proton parton densities, including hadronisation corrections. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors of the data, and the outer show the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature, except for the uncertainty associated with the absolute energy scale of the jets, which is shown separately as a shaded band. Comparisons of the NLO QCD calculation usi ng GRV-HO photon parton distributions with those using AFG-HO and GSG-HO photon parton distributions are shown as dashed and dotted lines respectively. The renormalisation and factorisation scales are defined by $\mu _R = \mu _F = \DOTSB \sum@ \slimits@ E_T/2$. The hatched band displays the uncertainty on the NLO QCD prediction s obtained by varying the renormalisation and factorisation scales by a factor of 2 up and down. }}{9}}
\newlabel{fig:xsec_hiet_2}{{3}{9}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces  The measured differential $e^+ p$ cross-section $d\sigma / dE_T^{jet}$ for inclusive jet production at $Q^2 \leq 1\nobreakspace  {}\@mathrm {GeV}^2$ using the inclusive $k_T$ algorithm integrated over $-1 \leq \eta ^{jet} \leq 2.5$ for $0.1 \leq y \leq 0.5$ (upper left plot) and $0.5 \leq y \leq 0.9$ (upper right plot). The inner error bars represent the statistical errors of the data, and the outer show the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. Data are compared with QCD calculations using GRV-HO and CTEQ5M parton distributions for the photon and the proton. The LO and NLO predictions are shown as dotted and dashed lines respectively. The full line indicates the NLO predictions with hadronisation corrections. The renormalisation and factorisation scales are defin ed by $\mu _R = \mu _F = \DOTSB \sum@ \slimits@ E_T/2$. The hatched band displays the uncertainty on th e NLO QCD predictions obtained by varying the renormalisation and factorisation scales by a factor of 2 up and down. The relative difference between the data and the NLO calculation based on GRV-HO and CTEQ5M is shown on the two lower plots. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors of the data, and the outer show the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature, except for the uncertainty associated with the absolute energy scale of the jets, which is shown separately as a shaded band. Comparisons of the NLO QCD calculations using GRV-HO with those using AFG-HO and GSG-HO photon parton distributions are shown as dashed and dotted lines respectively. }}{10}}
\newlabel{fig:xsec_hiet_3}{{4}{10}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces  The measured differential $e^+ p$ cross-section $d\sigma / d\eta ^{jet}$ for inclusive jet production using the inclusive $k_T$ algorithm integrated over $21 \leq E_T^{jet} \leq 75\nobreakspace  {}\rm  GeV$ in the kinematic region defined by $Q^2 \leq 1\nobreakspace  {}\@mathrm {GeV}^2$ and $0.1 \leq y \leq 0.9$. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors of the data, and the outer show the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature, except for the uncertainty associated with the absolute energy scale of the jets, which is shown separately as a shaded band. Data are compared with NLO QCD predictions taking into account hadronisation corrections obtained by using GRV-HO (full line), AFG-HO (dashed line) and GSG-HO (dotted line) photon parton distributions and CTEQ5M proton parton distributions. The renormalisation and factorisation scales are defined by $\mu _R = \mu _F = \DOTSB \sum@ \slimits@ E_T/2$. The hatched band displays the uncertainty on the NLO QCD prediction s using GRV-HO photon parton distributions obtained by varying the renormalisation and factorisation scales by a factor of 2 up and down. }}{11}}
\newlabel{fig:xsec_hiet_11}{{5}{11}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces  The relative difference between the measured differential $e^+ p$ cross-section $d\sigma /d\eta ^{jet}$ for inclusive jet production using the inclusive $k_T$ alg orithm integrated over $-1 \leq \eta ^{jet} \leq 2.5$ in the kinematic region defined by $Q^2 \leq 1\nobreakspace  {}\@mathrm {GeV}^2$ and $0.1 \leq y \leq 0.9$, and the NLO calculation based on GRV-HO and CTEQ5M parameterisations of the photon and proton parton densities, including hadronisation corrections. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors of the data, and the outer show the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature, except for the uncertainty associated with the absolute energy scale of the jets, which is shown separately as a shaded band. Comparisons of the NLO QCD calculation using GRV-HO photon parton distributions with those using AFG-HO and GSG-HO photon parton distributions are shown as dashed and dotted lines respectively. The renormalisation and factorisation scales are defined by $\mu _R = \mu _F = \DOTSB \sum@ \slimits@ E_T/2$. The hatched band displays the uncertainty on the NLO QCD prediction s obtained by varying the renormalisation and factorisation scales by a factor of 2 up and down. }}{12}}
\newlabel{fig:xsec_hiet_12}{{6}{12}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces  The measured differential $e^+ p$ cross-section $d\sigma / d\eta ^{jet}$ for inclusive jet production using the inclusive $k_T$ algorithm integrated over various $E_T^{jet}$ ranges in the kinematic region defined by $Q^2 \leq 1\nobreakspace  {}\@mathrm {GeV}^2$ and $0.1 \leq y \leq 0.9$. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors of the data, and the outer show the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature, except for the uncertainty associated with the absolute energy scale of the jets, which is shown separately as a shaded band. Data are compared with NLO QCD predictions taking into account hadronisation corrections (full line) obtained b y using GRV-HO photon parton distributions and CTEQ5M proton parton distributions. The renormalisation and factorisation scales are defined by $\mu _ R = \mu _F = \DOTSB \sum@ \slimits@ E_T/2$. The hatched band displays the uncertainty on the NLO QC D predictions obtained by varying the renormalisation and factorisation scales by a factor of 2 up and down. The dashed line shows the NLO QCD predictions without applying hadronisation corrections. }}{13}}
\newlabel{fig:xsec_hiet_10}{{7}{13}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces  The measured differential $e^+ p$ cross-section $d\sigma / d\eta ^{jet}$ for inclusive jet production using the inclusive $k_T$ algorithm integrated over various $E_T^{jet}$ and $y$ ranges in the kinematic region defined by $Q^2 \leq 1\nobreakspace  {}\@mathrm {GeV}^2$. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors of the data, and the outer show the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature, except for the uncertainty associated with the absolute energy scale of the jets, which is shown separately as a shaded band. Data are compared with NLO QCD predictions taking into account hadronisation corrections obtained by using GRV-HO (full line), AFG-HO (dashed line) and GSG-HO (dotted line) photon parton distributions and CTEQ5M proton parton distributions. The renormalisation and factorisation scales are defined by $\mu _R = \mu _F = \DOTSB \sum@ \slimits@ E_T/2$. }}{14}}
\newlabel{fig:xsec_hiet_9}{{8}{14}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces  The differential $e^+ p$ cross-section $d\sigma / dE_T^{jet}$ for inclusive jet production using the inclusive $k_T$ algorithm integrated over $-0.75 \leq \eta ^{jet} \leq 2.5$ and $0.2 \leq y \leq 0.85$. Data are compared with the preliminary result from ZEUS\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {zeuset}. }}{15}}
\newlabel{fig:zeus_h1_combined_Et_kt}{{9}{15}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces  The differential $e^+ p$ cross-section $d\sigma / d\eta ^{jet}$ for inclusive jet production using the CDF cone algorithm with radius $R=1$ integrated over $0.2 \leq y \leq 0.85$ and $E_T^{jet} > E_0$ for two different thresholds $E_0 = 21$\nobreakspace  {}G eV (left plot) and $E_0 = 25$\nobreakspace  {}GeV (right plot). Data are compared with the published results from ZEUS\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {zeusrp}. }}{15}}
\newlabel{fig:zeus_h1_combined_eta_cone}{{10}{15}}