%================================================================
% LaTeX file with prefered layout for H1 paper drafts
% use: dvips -D600 file-name
%================================================================
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{epsfig}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{hhline}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{times}
\usepackage{cite}
\renewcommand{\topfraction}{1.0}
\renewcommand{\bottomfraction}{1.0}
\renewcommand{\textfraction}{0.0}
\newlength{\dinwidth}
\newlength{\dinmargin}
\setlength{\dinwidth}{21.0cm}
\textheight23.5cm \textwidth16.0cm
\setlength{\dinmargin}{\dinwidth}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}
\addtolength{\dinmargin}{-\textwidth}
\setlength{\dinmargin}{0.5\dinmargin}
\oddsidemargin -1.0in
\addtolength{\oddsidemargin}{\dinmargin}
\setlength{\evensidemargin}{\oddsidemargin}
\setlength{\marginparwidth}{0.9\dinmargin}
\marginparsep 8pt \marginparpush 5pt
\topmargin -42pt
\headheight 12pt
\headsep 30pt \footskip 24pt
\parskip 3mm plus 2mm minus 2mm
%===============================title page=============================
\begin{document}  
% The rest
\newcommand{\pom}{{I\!\!P}}
\newcommand{\reg}{{I\!\!R}}
\newcommand{\slowpi}{\pi_{\mathit{slow}}}
%\newcommand{\gevsq}{\mathrm{GeV}^2}
\newcommand{\fiidiii}{F_2^{D(3)}}
\newcommand{\fiidiiiarg}{\fiidiii\,(\beta,\,Q^2,\,x)}
\newcommand{\n}{1.19\pm 0.06 (stat.) \pm0.07 (syst.)}
\newcommand{\nz}{1.30\pm 0.08 (stat.)^{+0.08}_{-0.14} (syst.)}
\newcommand{\fiidiiiful}{F_2^{D(4)}\,(\beta,\,Q^2,\,x,\,t)}
\newcommand{\fiipom}{\tilde F_2^D}
\newcommand{\ALPHA}{1.10\pm0.03 (stat.) \pm0.04 (syst.)}
\newcommand{\ALPHAZ}{1.15\pm0.04 (stat.)^{+0.04}_{-0.07} (syst.)}
\newcommand{\fiipomarg}{\fiipom\,(\beta,\,Q^2)}
\newcommand{\pomflux}{f_{\pom / p}}
\newcommand{\nxpom}{1.19\pm 0.06 (stat.) \pm0.07 (syst.)}
\newcommand {\gapprox}
   {\raisebox{-0.7ex}{$\stackrel {\textstyle>}{\sim}$}}
\newcommand {\lapprox}
   {\raisebox{-0.7ex}{$\stackrel {\textstyle<}{\sim}$}}
\def\gsim{\,\lower.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle\sim$}\kern-1.30ex%
\raise 0.55ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle >$}\,}
\def\lsim{\,\lower.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle\sim$}\kern-1.30ex%
\raise 0.55ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle <$}\,}
\newcommand{\pomfluxarg}{f_{\pom / p}\,(x_\pom)}
\newcommand{\dsf}{\mbox{$F_2^{D(3)}$}}
\newcommand{\dsfva}{\mbox{$F_2^{D(3)}(\beta,Q^2,x_{I\!\!P})$}}
\newcommand{\dsfvb}{\mbox{$F_2^{D(3)}(\beta,Q^2,x)$}}
\newcommand{\dsfpom}{$F_2^{I\!\!P}$}
\newcommand{\gap}{\stackrel{>}{\sim}}
\newcommand{\lap}{\stackrel{<}{\sim}}
\newcommand{\fem}{$F_2^{em}$}
\newcommand{\tsnmp}{$\tilde{\sigma}_{NC}(e^{\mp})$}
\newcommand{\tsnm}{$\tilde{\sigma}_{NC}(e^-)$}
\newcommand{\tsnp}{$\tilde{\sigma}_{NC}(e^+)$}
\newcommand{\st}{$\star$}
\newcommand{\sst}{$\star \star$}
\newcommand{\ssst}{$\star \star \star$}
\newcommand{\sssst}{$\star \star \star \star$}
\newcommand{\tw}{\theta_W}
\newcommand{\sw}{\sin{\theta_W}}
\newcommand{\cw}{\cos{\theta_W}}
\newcommand{\sww}{\sin^2{\theta_W}}
\newcommand{\cww}{\cos^2{\theta_W}}
\newcommand{\trm}{m_{\perp}}
\newcommand{\trp}{p_{\perp}}
\newcommand{\trmm}{m_{\perp}^2}
\newcommand{\trpp}{p_{\perp}^2}
\newcommand{\alp}{\alpha_s}

\newcommand{\alps}{\alpha_s}
\newcommand{\sqrts}{$\sqrt{s}$}
\newcommand{\LO}{$O(\alpha_s^0)$}
\newcommand{\Oa}{$O(\alpha_s)$}
\newcommand{\Oaa}{$O(\alpha_s^2)$}
\newcommand{\PT}{p_{\perp}}
\newcommand{\JPSI}{J/\psi}
\newcommand{\sh}{\hat{s}}
%\newcommand{\th}{\hat{t}}
\newcommand{\uh}{\hat{u}}
\newcommand{\MP}{m_{J/\psi}}
%\newcommand{\PO}{\mbox{l}\!\mbox{P}}
\newcommand{\PO}{I\!\!P}
\newcommand{\xbj}{x}
\newcommand{\xpom}{x_{\PO}}
\newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
\newcommand{\xpomlo}{3\times10^{-4}}  
\newcommand{\xpomup}{0.05}  
\newcommand{\dgr}{^\circ}
\newcommand{\pbarnt}{\,\mbox{{\rm pb$^{-1}$}}}
\newcommand{\gev}{\,\mbox{GeV}}
\newcommand{\WBoson}{\mbox{$W$}}
\newcommand{\fbarn}{\,\mbox{{\rm fb}}}
\newcommand{\fbarnt}{\,\mbox{{\rm fb$^{-1}$}}}
%
% Some useful tex commands
%
\newcommand{\qsq}{\ensuremath{Q^2} }
\newcommand{\gevsq}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{GeV}^2} }
\newcommand{\et}{\ensuremath{E_t^*} }
\newcommand{\rap}{\ensuremath{\eta^*} }
\newcommand{\gp}{\ensuremath{\gamma^*}p }
\newcommand{\dsiget}{\ensuremath{{\rm d}\sigma_{ep}/{\rm d}E_t^*} }
\newcommand{\dsigrap}{\ensuremath{{\rm d}\sigma_{ep}/{\rm d}\eta^*} }
% Journal macro
\def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#1} {\bf #2} (#3) #4}
\def\NCA{\em Nuovo Cimento}
\def\NIM{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods}
\def\NIMA{{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods} {\bf A}}
\def\NPB{{\em Nucl. Phys.}   {\bf B}}
\def\PLB{{\em Phys. Lett.}   {\bf B}}
\def\PRL{\em Phys. Rev. Lett.}
\def\PRD{{\em Phys. Rev.}    {\bf D}}
\def\ZPC{{\em Z. Phys.}      {\bf C}}
\def\EJC{{\em Eur. Phys. J.} {\bf C}}
\def\CPC{\em Comp. Phys. Commun.}





 



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%



\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/2jets_m2.ps,width=0.5\textwidth}
\caption{Hadronic cross sections for 2-jet production as function of
  the invariant dijet mass $M_{JJ}$ of the two highest $E_T$ jets. The inner
  error bars denotes the statistical, the outer error bars the
  quadratic sum of all statistical and systematic errors of the data.
  The LO predictions 
  using CTEQ5M structure functions for the proton and
  GRV-HO structure functions for the photon are
  shown as a dotted line.
  NLO predictions with the same structure functions are shown
  as a dashed line.
  NLO predictions with hadronization corrections are shown as 
  a full line, the grey band
  indicates the renormalization and factorization
  scale uncertainties of the NLO prediction.}
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/2jets_pt.ps,width=0.5\textwidth}
\caption{Hadronic cross sections for 2-jet production as function of
  the $E_T$ of the highest $E_T$ jet $E_{T,Max}$. The inner
  error bars denotes the statistical, the outer error bars the
  quadratic sum of all statistical and systematic errors of the data.
  The LO predictions 
  using CTEQ5M structure functions for the proton and
  GRV-HO structure functions for the photon are
  shown as a dotted line.
  NLO predictions with the same structure functions are shown
  as a dashed line.
  NLO predictions with hadronization corrections are shown as 
  a full line, the grey band
  indicates the renormalization and factorization
  scale uncertainties of the NLO prediction.}


\end{figure}
%\begin{figure}[hhh]
%\center
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/h2jets_m2.ps,width=0.5\textwidth}
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/h2jets_pt.ps,width=0.5\textwidth}
%\end{figure}
%\begin{figure}[hhh]
%\center
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/3.2jets_m2.ps,width=0.5\textwidth}
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/3.2jets_pt.ps,width=0.5\textwidth}
%\end{figure}




\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/etam_ybin.ps,width=\textwidth}
\caption{Hadronic cross sections for 2-jet production as function of
  the $\overline{\eta}$ of the two highest $E_T$ jets.
  The upper plots shows the low $y$ and the lower plots the high
  $y$ region. The left plots show the low $E_{T,max}$ and the
  right plots the high $E_{T,max}$ region.
  The inner
  error bars denotes the statistical, the outer error bars the
  quadratic sum of all statistical and systematic errors of the data.
  NLO predictions 
  using CTEQ5M structure functions for the proton and
  GRV-HO structure functions for the photon are
  shown as a dashed line.
  NLO predictions with hadronization corrections are shown as 
  a full line, the grey band
  indicates the renormalization and factorization
  scale uncertainties of the NLO prediction.}
\end{figure}
%\begin{figure}[hhh]
%\center
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/hetam_ybin.ps,width=\textwidth}
%\end{figure}
%\begin{figure}[hhh]
%\center
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/3etam_ybin.ps,width=\textwidth}
%\end{figure}


\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/xgam_xp1.ps,width=\textwidth}
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/xgam_xp2.ps,width=\textwidth}
\caption{Hadronic cross sections for 2-jet production as function of
  $x_{\gamma}$ (upper plots) and $x_P$ (lower plots).
  The upper left plot shows the cross sections as a function of 
  $x_{\gamma}$ for the lower $x_P$ region, the upper
  right plot for the higher $x_P$ region. 
  The lower right plot shows the cross sections as a function of 
  $x_P$ for the higher $x_{\gamma}$ region, the lower 
  left plot for the lower $x_{\gamma}$ region. 
  The inner
  error bars denotes the statistical, the outer error bars the
  quadratic sum of all statistical and systematic errors of the data.
  The NLO predictions 
  using CTEQ5M structure functions for the proton and
  GRV-HO structure functions for the photon are
  shown as a dashed line.
  NLO predictions with hadronization corrections are shown as 
  a full line, the grey band
  indicates the renormalization and factorization
  scale uncertainties of the NLO prediction.}

\end{figure}

%\begin{figure}[hhh]
%\center
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/hxgam_xp.ps,width=\textwidth}
%\end{figure}
%\begin{figure}[hhh]
%\center
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/3xgam_xp.ps,width=\textwidth}
%\end{figure}

%\begin{figure}[hhh]
%\center
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/2jets_xgampt.ps,width=\textwidth}
%\end{figure}

%\begin{figure}[hhh]
%\center
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/h2jets_xgampt.ps,width=\textwidth}
%\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/3.2jets_xgampt.ps,width=\textwidth}
\caption{Hadronic cross sections for 2-jet production as function of
  $x_{\gamma}$.
  The left plots shows the cross sections 
  for the lower $E_{T,max}$ region, the right 
  plots for the higher $E_{T,max}$ region. 
  The inner
  error bars denotes the statistical, the outer error bars the
  quadratic sum of all statistical and systematic errors of the data.
  The NLO predictions 
  using CTEQ5M structure functions for the proton and
  GRV-HO structure functions for the photon and
  including hadronization corrections
  are shown
  as a full line. NLO predictions using AFG-HO and GSG-HO parametrizations
  of the photon structure functions and including hadronization 
  corrections are shown as dashed (AFG) and dotted (GSG) line. }
\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/2jets_xgampt.ps,width=\textwidth}
\caption{Hadronic cross sections for 2-jet production as function of
  $x_{\gamma}$.
  The left plots shows the cross sections 
  for the lower $E_{T,max}$ region, the right 
  plots for the higher $E_{T,max}$ region. 
  The inner
  error bars denotes the statistical, the outer error bars the
  quadratic sum of all statistical and systematic errors of the data.
  The NLO predictions 
  using CTEQ5M structure functions for the proton and
  GRV-HO structure functions for the photon are
  shown as a dashed line.
  NLO predictions with hadronization corrections are shown as 
  a full line, the grey band
  indicates the renormalization and factorization
  scale uncertainties of the NLO prediction.}

\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/2jets_xgamptratio.ps,width=\textwidth}

\caption{The relative difference of the 2-jet cross sections as a
 function of $x_{\gamma}$ to
the NLO prediction with hadronization corrections
 using CTEQ5M structure functions for the proton and
  GRV-HO structure functions for the photon.
  The Data is shown as points.
  The inner
  error bars denotes the statistical, the outer error bars the
  quadratic sum of all statistical and of the uncorrelated 
  systematic errors of the data.
  The correlated systematic errors are shown in the middle two plots 
  as a shaded band.
  The grey band (two lower plots) 
  shows the renormalization and factorization
  scale uncertainties of this NLO prediction.}

\end{figure}

\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/2jets_xgamptratio2.ps,width=\textwidth}

\caption{Hadronic cross sections for 2-jet production as function of
  $x_{\gamma}$ (upper plots).
  The inner
  error bars denotes 
  the statistical, the outer error bars the
  quadratic sum of all statistical and systematic
  (correlated and uncorrelated) errors of the data.
  The NLO predictions 
  using CTEQ5M structure functions for the proton and
  GRV-HO structure functions for the photon are
  shown as a dashed line.  
  NLO predictions with hadronization corrections are shown as 
  a full line.
  The middle plot shows the 
  relative difference of the 2-jet cross sections to
  the NLO prediction with hadronization corrections
  using CTEQ5M structure functions for the proton and
  GRV-HO structure functions for the photon.
  Here the inner
  error bars denotes 
  the statistical, the outer error bars the
  quadratic sum of all statistical and uncorrelated errors of the data.
  The Data is shown as points.
  The correlated systematic errors are shown below as a shaded band.
  The lowest plots 
  show the renormalization and factorization
  scale uncertainties of the NLO prediction.}
  
  

\end{figure}



\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
%\epsfig{file=/x01/usr/scaron/plots/2jets_costh.ps,width=\textwidth}
\caption{Hadronic cross sections for 2-jet production as function of
  $\cos \theta^*$.
  The left plots shows the cross sections 
  for the higher $x_{\gamma}$ region, the right 
  plots for the lower $x_{\gamma}$ region. 
  The lower two plot shows the cross sections for an additional cut on
  the invariant mass of the dijet system. 
  The inner
  error bars denotes the statistical, the outer error bars the
  quadratic sum of all statistical and systematic errors of the data.
    The NLO predictions 
  using CTEQ5M structure functions for the proton and
  GRV-HO structure functions for the photon are
  shown as a dashed line.
  NLO predictions with hadronization corrections are shown as 
  a full line, the grey band
  indicates the renormalization and factorization
  scale uncertainties of the NLO prediction.}

\end{figure}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%





\end{document}




