\relax 
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces  The fraction of DIS events with forward photons in the kinematic region $6< Q^2 < 100\nobreakspace  {}$GeV$^2$ and $0.05<y<0.6$ and the pseudorapidity of the photon $\eta >7.9$. as a function of $W$. The predictions of MC models are compared to the measurements. }}{2}}
\newlabel{fig:1}{{1}{2}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces  The fraction of DIS events with forward neutrons in the kinematic region $6< Q^2 < 100\nobreakspace  {}$GeV$^2$ and $0.05<y<0.6$ and the pseudorapidity of the photon $\eta >7.9$. as a function of $W$. The predictions of MC models are compared to the measurements. }}{2}}
\newlabel{fig:1n}{{2}{2}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces  Normalised cross sections of forward photons production in DIS as a function of $x_F$ in the region $\eta >7.9$, $6< Q^2 < 100\nobreakspace  {}$GeV$^2$ and $0.05<y<0.6$, and in three $W$ intervals. The data are compared to two predictions of the DJANGOH Monte Carlo simulation, using LEPTO and CDM to simulate higher orders. The lower row shows the ratios of the MC predictions to the data. The error bars show the total experimental uncertainty, defined as the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. }}{3}}
\newlabel{fig:2}{{3}{3}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces  Ratios of normalised cross sections of forward photons production in DIS corresponding to two different $W$ intervals, shown in Fig.2, as a function of $x_F$. The left side figure shows the ratio of the cross section in $130<W<190$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval to the cross section at $70<W<130$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval. The right side figure shows the ratio of the cross section in $190<W<250$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval to the cross section at $70<W<130$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval. Predictions of LEPTO and CDM MC models are compared to the measurement. }}{4}}
\newlabel{fig:3}{{4}{4}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces  Normalised cross sections of forward photons production in DIS as a function of $x_F$ in the region $\eta >7.9$, $6< Q^2 < 100\nobreakspace  {}$GeV$^2$ and $0.05<y<0.6$, and in three $W$ intervals. The data are compared to predictions os hadronic interactions, QGSJET, EPOS and SIBYLL. The lower row shows the ratios of the MC predictions to the data. The error bars show the total experimental uncertainty, defined as the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. }}{5}}
\newlabel{fig:4}{{5}{5}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces  Ratios of normalised cross sections of forward photons production in DIS corresponding to two different $W$ intervals, shown in Fig.4, as a function of $x_F$. The left side figure shows the ratio of the cross section in $130<W<190$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval to the cross section at $70<W<130$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval. The right side figure shows the ratio of the cross section in $190<W<250$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval to the cross section at $70<W<130$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval. Predictions of LEPTO and CDM MC models are compared to the measurement. Predictions of CR models are compared to the measurement. }}{6}}
\newlabel{fig:5}{{6}{6}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces  Normalised cross sections of forward neutron production in DIS as a function of $x_F$ in the region $\eta >7.9$, $6< Q^2 < 100\nobreakspace  {}$GeV$^2$ and $0.05<y<0.6$, and in three $W$ intervals. The data are compared to two predictions of the Monte Carlo simulations CDM (Djangoh) and RAPGAP-$\pi $, and the combination of CDM and RAPGAP-$\pi $, multipled by the normalisation factors. The lower row shows the ratios of the MC predictions to the data. The error bars show the total experimental uncertainty, defined as the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. }}{7}}
\newlabel{fig:2n}{{7}{7}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces  Normalised cross sections of forward neutron production in DIS as a function of $x_F$ in the region $\eta >7.9$, $6< Q^2 < 100\nobreakspace  {}$GeV$^2$ and $0.05<y<0.6$, and in three $W$ intervals. The data are compared to predictions os hadronic interactions, QGSJET, EPOS and SIBYLL. The lower row shows the ratios of the MC predictions to the data. The error bars show the total experimental uncertainty, defined as the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. }}{8}}
\newlabel{fig:4n}{{8}{8}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces  Ratios of normalised cross sections of forward neutron production in DIS corresponding to two different $W$ intervals, shown in Fig.8, as a function of $x_F$. The left side figure shows the ratio of the cross section in $130<W<190$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval to the cross section at $70<W<130$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval. The right side figure shows the ratio of the cross section in $190<W<245$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval to the cross section at $70<W<130$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval. Predictions of CR models are compared to the measurement. }}{9}}
\newlabel{fig:5n}{{9}{9}}