\relax 
\citation{Buskulic:1994ny,Abreu:1994rg,Acciarri:1994gza,Acton:1992ry}
\citation{Acosta:2005pk}
\citation{Abelev:2006cs}
\citation{Derrick:1995ws,Aid:1996ui,Adloff:1997ym,Breitweg:1997kc,Chekanov:2006wz,Aaron:2008ck}
\citation{Aamodt:2011zza,Khachatryan:2011tm,Aaij:2010nx,Aaij:2011va,atlas12}
\citation{Aid:1996ui,Adloff:1997ym,Aaron:2008ck}
\citation{ref:breit}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{1}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces  Schematic diagrams for the processes contributing to strangeness production in $ep$ scattering: (a) direct production from the strange sea, (b) BGF, (c) heavy hadron decays and (d) fragmentation. The diagrams relevant for $K^0$ production are shown.}}{1}}
\newlabel{fig:production}{{1}{1}}
\citation{djangoh}
\citation{RAPGAP}
\citation{cteq6l}
\citation{cdm}
\citation{ariadne}
\citation{jetset}
\citation{lund}
\citation{ALEPH-TUNE}
\citation{geant}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Monte Carlo Simulation}{2}}
\citation{h1detector}
\citation{Pitzl:2000wz}
\citation{cip}
\citation{dedx}
\citation{Andrieu:1994yn}
\citation{spacal}
\citation{qedc}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Experimental Procedure}{3}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}The H1 Detector}{3}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Selection of DIS Events}{3}}
\citation{hfs}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Analysis phase space}}{4}}
\newlabel{tab:kine}{{1}{4}}
\newlabel{eq:kine}{{1}{4}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.3}Selection of {\relax \mathversion  {bold}$\Lambda $} Baryons}{4}}
\newlabel{sec:RecStr}{{3.3}{4}}
\citation{Pdg10}
\citation{Pdg10}
\citation{Pdg10}
\citation{HERACLES}
\newlabel{eq:massfits}{{2}{5}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Cross Sections Determination and Systematic Errors}{5}}
\newlabel{eq:sigman}{{3}{5}}
\citation{Pdg10}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Results and Discussion}{6}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}Inclusive Cross Sections}{6}}
\citation{Aaron:2008ck}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Monte Carlo predictions for different settings of the strangeness suppresion factor $\lambda _{s}$.}}{7}}
\newlabel{tab:McPred}{{2}{7}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}Differential cross sections}{7}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3}\relax \mathversion  {bold}\ensuremath  {\Lambda }\ Production to DIS Cross Section Ratio}{7}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.4}\ensuremath  {\Lambda }-- \ensuremath  {\mathaccentV {bar}016{\Lambda }}\ Asymmetries}{8}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Conclusions}{8}}
\bibcite{Buskulic:1994ny}{1}
\bibcite{Acciarri:1994gza}{2}
\bibcite{Abreu:1994rg}{3}
\bibcite{Acton:1992ry}{4}
\bibcite{ALEPH-TUNE}{5}
\bibcite{Acosta:2005pk}{6}
\bibcite{Abelev:2006cs}{7}
\bibcite{Derrick:1995ws}{8}
\bibcite{Aid:1996ui}{9}
\bibcite{Adloff:1997ym}{10}
\bibcite{Breitweg:1997kc}{11}
\bibcite{Chekanov:2006wz}{12}
\bibcite{Aaron:2008ck}{13}
\bibcite{Aamodt:2011zza}{14}
\bibcite{Khachatryan:2011tm}{15}
\bibcite{Aaij:2010nx}{16}
\bibcite{Aaij:2011va}{17}
\bibcite{atlas12}{18}
\bibcite{ref:breit}{19}
\bibcite{djangoh}{20}
\bibcite{RAPGAP}{21}
\bibcite{cteq6l}{22}
\bibcite{cdm}{23}
\bibcite{ariadne}{24}
\bibcite{jetset}{25}
\bibcite{lund}{26}
\bibcite{geant}{27}
\bibcite{h1detector}{28}
\bibcite{Pitzl:2000wz}{29}
\bibcite{cip}{30}
\bibcite{dedx}{31}
\bibcite{Andrieu:1994yn}{32}
\bibcite{spacal}{33}
\bibcite{qedc}{34}
\bibcite{hfs}{35}
\bibcite{Pdg10}{36}
\bibcite{HERACLES}{37}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces  Mass distributions for \ensuremath  {\Lambda +\mathaccentV {bar}016{\Lambda }}\ candidates. }}{12}}
\newlabel{fig:massdist}{{2}{12}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Differential \ensuremath  {\Lambda +\mathaccentV {bar}016{\Lambda }}\ production cross sections as a function of (a) the photon virtuality squared $Q^2$, (b) Bjorken scaling variable $x$, (c) the transverse momentum, $p_T$, of the \ensuremath  {\Lambda }\ baryon and (d) its pseudorapidity $\eta $ in comparison to RAPGAP (MEPS) and DJANGOH (CDM) with two different vaues of $\lambda _s$. The inner (outer) error bars show the statistical (total) errors. The ``MC/Data'' ratios are shown for different Monte Carlo predictions. For comparison, the data points are put to one. }}{13}}
\newlabel{fig:ds-lab}{{3}{13}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Differential \ensuremath  {\Lambda }\ production cross sections in the Breit frame as a function of (a) $p^{\rm  {BFC}}_{T}$, (b) $x^{\rm  {BFC}}$, (c) $p^{\rm  {BFT}}_{T}$, (d) $x^{\rm  {BFT}}$ in comparison to RAPGAP (MEPS) and DJANGOH (CDM) with two different vaues of $\lambda _s$. The inner (outer) error bars show the statistical (total) errors. The ``MC/Data'' ratios are shown for different Monte Carlo predictions. For the ratios the data points are put at one for comparison. }}{14}}
\newlabel{fig:ds-bf}{{4}{14}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces  Ratio R(DIS) of \ensuremath  {\Lambda }\ production to DIS cross section as a function of (a) the photon virtuality squared $Q^2$ and (b) Bjorken scaling variable $x$ in comparison to RAPGAP (MEPS) and DJANGOH (CDM) with two different vaues of $\lambda _s$. The inner (outer) error bars show the statistical (total) errors. The ``MC/Data'' ratios are shown for different Monte Carlo predictions. For the ratios the data points are put at one for comparison. }}{15}}
\newlabel{fig:rat-dis}{{5}{15}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Asymmetry $A_\Lambda $ as a function of (a) the photon virtuality squared $Q^2$, (b) Bjorken scaling variable $x$, (c) the transverse momentum, $p_T$ and (d) its pseudorapidity $\eta $ in the laboratory frame in comparison to RAPGAP (MEPS) and DJANGOH (CDM) with two different vaues of $\lambda _s$. }}{16}}
\newlabel{fig:asy-lab}{{6}{16}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces  Asymmetry $A_\Lambda $ as a function of the Breit frame variables (a) $p^{\rm  {BFC}}_{T}$, (b) $x^{\rm  {BFC}}$, (c) $p^{\rm  {BFT}}_{T}$, (d) $x^{\rm  {BFT}}$ in comparison to RAPGAP (MEPS) and DJANGOH (CDM) with two different vaues of $\lambda _s$. }}{17}}
\newlabel{fig:asy-bf}{{7}{17}}