\relax 
\citation{H1Diff94,H1LRG,H1DiJets,H1DiJets2,H1Charm,ZEUSLPS2,ZEUSDiJets,ZEUSDPDF}
\citation{Collins}
\citation{DGLAP,DGLAP2,DGLAP3,DGLAP4}
\citation{H1LRG,H1DiJets,ZEUSDPDF}
\citation{H1DiJets,ZEUSDPDF}
\citation{H1DiJets,H1DiJets2}
\citation{H1FPS,H1FPShera2}
\citation{H1LRG,H1DiJets}
\citation{H1DiJets}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{4}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces The leading order boson gluon fusion diagram for dijet production in diffractive DIS.}}{5}}
\newlabel{kine}{{1}{5}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Kinematics}{5}}
\citation{H1LRG,H1DiJets,ZEUSDPDF}
\citation{res1,res2}
\citation{res1}
\citation{RAPGAP}
\citation{H1LRG}
\citation{owens}
\citation{2gluphot}
\citation{bart,bart2}
\citation{a0ref}
\citation{lowx3,lowx4}
\citation{gal}
\citation{lepto}
\citation{leptodglap1,leptodglap2}
\citation{2gluprot}
\citation{Lund}
\citation{Pythia}
\citation{nlojet}
\citation{H1LRG}
\citation{H1DiJets}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Theoretical Framework and Monte Carlo Models}{6}}
\newlabel{models}{{3}{6}}
\citation{DGLAP,DGLAP2,DGLAP3,DGLAP4}
\citation{cdm}
\citation{H1FPShera2}
\citation{H1FPS}
\citation{h1detector,h1detector2,SPACAL}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Experimental Technique}{7}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.1}H1 detector}{7}}
\newlabel{detector}{{4.1}{7}}
\citation{SPACAL}
\citation{SPACAL_TEST}
\citation{LAR,LAR2}
\citation{hadroo2}
\citation{FPS}
\citation{H1FPShera2}
\citation{H1Diff94}
\citation{dameth}
\citation{ELAN}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}Kinematic reconstruction}{9}}
\newlabel{eq:y}{{4}{9}}
\newlabel{eq:xpomfps}{{5}{9}}
\newlabel{eq:tdef}{{6}{9}}
\newlabel{eq:zpomdef}{{7}{9}}
\newlabel{eq:detadef}{{8}{9}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.3}Event selection}{9}}
\citation{H1DiJets,H1DiJets2,ZEUSDiJets}
\citation{H1LRG,H1DiJets,ZEUSDPDF}
\citation{H1FPS}
\citation{ktalgorithm}
\citation{fast}
\citation{H1DiJets,ZEUSDPDF}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {4.3.1}DIS selection}{10}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {4.3.2}Leading proton selection}{10}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {4.3.3}Jet selection}{10}}
\newlabel{jetselection}{{4.3.3}{10}}
\citation{H1FPShera2}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Phase space of the diffractive dijet FPS measurements.}}{11}}
\newlabel{kinrange}{{1}{11}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Corrections to the Data and Cross Section Determination}{11}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}Background subtraction}{11}}
\newlabel{bgncor}{{5.1}{11}}
\citation{Geant3}
\citation{RAPGAP}
\citation{HERACLES}
\citation{RPThesis}
\citation{blobel}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}Detector simulation}{12}}
\newlabel{mc}{{5.2}{12}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3}Cross section determination}{12}}
\newlabel{xsect}{{5.3}{12}}
\citation{unf,unf2}
\citation{iter}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Systematic Uncertainties on the Measured Cross Sections}{13}}
\newlabel{systs}{{6}{13}}
\citation{H1DiJets}
\citation{H1LRG,H1DiJets}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Results}{15}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Total cross section for the \textquoteleft two central jets' and \textquoteleft one central + one forward jet' samples compared to the NLO QCD calculations.}}{15}}
\newlabel{ccftable}{{2}{15}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.1}Differential cross section for the production of two central jets}{15}}
\newlabel{2cjxs}{{7.1}{15}}
\citation{H1LRG}
\citation{H1FPShera2}
\citation{H1DiJets}
\citation{H1FPShera2}
\citation{BFKL,BFKL2,BFKL3}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.2}Differential cross section for the production of one central + one forward jet}{17}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {8}Summary}{17}}
\bibstyle{unsrt}
\bibcite{H1Diff94}{1}
\bibcite{H1LRG}{2}
\bibcite{H1DiJets}{3}
\bibcite{H1DiJets2}{4}
\bibcite{H1Charm}{5}
\bibcite{ZEUSDiJets}{6}
\bibcite{ZEUSLPS2}{7}
\bibcite{ZEUSDPDF}{8}
\bibcite{Collins}{9}
\bibcite{DGLAP}{10}
\bibcite{DGLAP2}{11}
\bibcite{DGLAP3}{12}
\bibcite{DGLAP4}{13}
\bibcite{H1FPS}{14}
\bibcite{H1FPShera2}{15}
\bibcite{res1}{16}
\bibcite{res2}{17}
\bibcite{RAPGAP}{18}
\bibcite{owens}{19}
\bibcite{2gluphot}{20}
\bibcite{bart}{21}
\bibcite{bart2}{22}
\bibcite{a0ref}{23}
\bibcite{lowx3}{24}
\bibcite{lowx4}{25}
\bibcite{gal}{26}
\bibcite{lepto}{27}
\bibcite{leptodglap1}{28}
\bibcite{leptodglap2}{29}
\bibcite{2gluprot}{30}
\bibcite{Lund}{31}
\bibcite{Pythia}{32}
\bibcite{nlojet}{33}
\bibcite{cdm}{34}
\bibcite{h1detector}{35}
\bibcite{h1detector2}{36}
\bibcite{SPACAL}{37}
\bibcite{SPACAL_TEST}{38}
\bibcite{LAR}{39}
\bibcite{LAR2}{40}
\bibcite{hadroo2}{41}
\bibcite{FPS}{42}
\bibcite{dameth}{43}
\bibcite{ELAN}{44}
\bibcite{ktalgorithm}{45}
\bibcite{fast}{46}
\bibcite{Geant3}{47}
\bibcite{HERACLES}{48}
\bibcite{RPThesis}{49}
\bibcite{blobel}{50}
\bibcite{unf}{51}
\bibcite{unf2}{52}
\bibcite{iter}{53}
\bibcite{BFKL}{54}
\bibcite{BFKL2}{55}
\bibcite{BFKL3}{56}
\citation{H1FPShera2}
\citation{H1FPShera2}
\citation{H1DiJets}
\citation{H1DiJets}
\newlabel{RF1}{{8}{22}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections for the production of two central jets in diffractive DIS as a function of $Q^2$, $y$, $\qopname  \relax o{log}_{10}(x_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P})$ and $z_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$. The total ($\delta _{tot}$), statistical ($\delta _{stat}$) and systematic ($\delta _{sys}$) uncertainties and the correlation coefficients $\rho $ of the cross section covariance matrix defined in section\nobreakspace  {}5.3\hbox {} are given together with the changes of the cross sections due to a $+ 1 \sigma $ variation of the various systematic error sources described in section\nobreakspace  {}6\hbox {}: the electromagnetic energy scale ($\delta _{ele}$), the scattering angle of the electron ($\delta _{\theta }$), the leading proton energy $E_p$ ($\delta _{E_p}$), the proton transverse momentum components $P_x$ ($\delta _{P_x}$) and $P_y$ ($\delta _{P_y}$), the reweighting of the simulation in $\eta _2$ ($\delta _{\eta _2}$) and $x_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$ ($\delta _{x_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}}$) the hadronic energy scale ($\delta E_{had}$), the reweighting of the simulation in $\beta $ ($\delta _{\beta }$), $Q^2$ ($\delta _{Q^2}$) and $P_T^*$ ($\delta _{P_T^*}$). All uncertainties are given in per cent. The normalisation uncertainty of $7\%$ is not included. The hadronisation correction factors $(1+\delta _{had})$ applied to the NLO calculations and the associated uncertainty are shown in the last column.}}{22}}
\newlabel{dijet}{{3}{22}}
\newlabel{RF2}{{8}{23}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections for the production of two central jets in diffractive DIS as a function of $P^*_{T,1}$, $|\Delta \eta ^*|$ and $|t|$. The normalisation uncertainties of $4.6\%$ for the differential cross section in $|t|$ and $7\%$ for other cross sections are not included. For details see table 3\hbox {}.}}{23}}
\newlabel{RF3}{{8}{24}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections for the production of one central and one forward jet in diffractive DIS as a function of $\delimiter "426830A P^*_{T}\delimiter "526930B $, $|\Delta \eta ^*|$, $\eta _{f}$, $z_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$, $\qopname  \relax o{log}_{10}(\beta )$ and $|\Delta \phi ^*|$. The normalisation uncertainty of $6.2\%$ is not included. For more details see table 3\hbox {}. }}{24}}
\newlabel{cfjet}{{5}{24}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces The distribution of $\DOTSB \sum@ \slimits@ (E+P_z)$ for FPS DIS events (points) and for beam-halo DIS events (shaded histogram).}}{25}}
\newlabel{fig:epzplot}{{2}{25}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces  The distributions of the variables $x_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$ (a) and $|t|$ (b) reconstructed using the FPS (points) for events with two central jets. The beam-halo background is subtracted from the data. The RAPGAP Monte Carlo simulation, reweighted to describe the $\eta _2^*$ distribution, is shown as a histogram. Contributions from sub-processes are illustrated in the $x_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$ distribution as areas filled with different colours.}}{25}}
\newlabel{fig:fpsplots1}{{3}{25}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces The distributions of the variables $P_{T,1}^{*}$, $|\Delta \eta ^{*}|$ and $z_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$ for events with two central jets and of the variables $\delimiter "426830A P_T^*\delimiter "526930B $, $\eta _f$ and $z_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$ for events with one central and one forward jet (histogram with the error bars). The beam-halo background is subtracted from the data.}}{26}}
\newlabel{fig:fpsplots2}{{4}{26}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces The differential cross section for the production of two central jets shown as a function of $Q^2$, $y$, $\qopname  \relax o{log}_{10}(x_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P})$ and $z_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors. The outer error bars indicate the statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature. NLO QCD predictions based on the DPDF set H1 2007 Jets, corrected to the level of stable hadrons, are shown as a solid line and a dark green band indicating the hadronisation uncertainties and light green band indicating the hadronisation and scale uncertainties added in quadrature. LO QCD predictions based on the same DPDF set are shown as a dotted line. The NLO calculations based on the DPDF set H1 2006 Fit B with applied hadronisation corrections are shown as a thick line. R denotes the ratio of the measured cross sections and QCD predictions to the nominal values of the measured cross sections. The total normalisation error of $7.0\%$ is not shown.}}{27}}
\newlabel{dijnlo1}{{5}{27}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces The differential cross section for production of two central jets shown as a function of $P_{T,1}^*$ and $|\Delta \eta ^*|$. For more details see figure 5\hbox {}.}}{28}}
\newlabel{dijnlo2}{{6}{28}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces The differential cross section for the production of two central jets shown as a function of $Q^2$, $y$, $\qopname  \relax o{log}_{10}(x_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P})$ and $z_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors. The outer error bars indicate the statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature. The RP and SCI+GAL models are shown as solid and dotted lines, respectively. R denotes the ratio of the measured cross sections and MC model predictions to the nominal values of the measured cross sections. The total normalisation error of $7.0\%$ is not shown.}}{29}}
\newlabel{dijmc1}{{7}{29}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces The differential cross section for production of two central jets shown as a function of $P_{T,1}^{*}$ and $|\Delta \eta ^*|$. For more details see figure 7\hbox {}.}}{30}}
\newlabel{dijmc2}{{8}{30}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces The differential cross section for production of two central jets shown as a function of $t$ (a), the corresponding $t$-slope (circle) shown as a function of $x_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$ (b). The result is compared to the H1 inclusive diffractive DIS data (triangles) \cite  {H1FPShera2}. The error bars indicate the statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature.}}{30}}
\newlabel{tfit}{{9}{30}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces The differential cross section for the production of two central jets in the phase space of the LRG measurement\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {H1DiJets} as described the text in section\nobreakspace  {}7.1\hbox {}. The cross section is shown as a function of $\qopname  \relax o{log}_{10}(x_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P})$. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors. The outer error bars indicate the statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature. The published LRG dijet data are scaled down by a factor of $1.20$ to correct for the proton dissociation contribution are shown as open circles with the error bars indicating the statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature.}}{31}}
\newlabel{mozlog}{{10}{31}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces The differential cross section for the production of one central and one forward jet shown as a function of the mean transverse momentum of two jets $\delimiter "426830A P_T^*\delimiter "526930B $, $|\Delta \eta ^*|$ and $\eta _f$. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors. The outer error bars indicate the statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature. NLO QCD predictions based on the DPDF set H1 2007 Jets, corrected to the level of stable hadrons, are shown as a line with a dark green band indicating the hadronisation error and light green band indicating the hadronisation and scale errors added in quadrature. LO predictions based on the same DPDF set are shown as a dotted line. The NLO calculations based on the DPDF set H1 2006 Fit B with applied hadronisation corrections is shown as a thick line. R denotes the ratio of the measured cross sections and QCD predictions to the nominal values of the measured cross sections. The total normalisation error of $6.2\%$ is not shown.}}{32}}
\newlabel{cfnlo1}{{11}{32}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {12}{\ignorespaces The differential cross section for production of one central and one forward jet shown as a function of $z_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$, $\qopname  \relax o{log}_{10}(\beta )$ and $|\Delta \phi ^*|$. For more details see figure 11\hbox {}.}}{33}}
\newlabel{cfnlo2}{{12}{33}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {13}{\ignorespaces The differential cross section for production of one central and one forward jet shown as a function of the mean transverse momentum of two jets $\delimiter "426830A P_T^*\delimiter "526930B $, $|\Delta \eta ^*|$ and $\eta _f$. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors. The outer error bars indicate the statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature. The RP and the SCI+GAL models are shown as solid and dotted lines, respectively. R denotes the ratio of the measured cross sections and MC model predictions to the nominal values of the measured cross sections. The total normalisation error of $6.2\%$ is not shown.}}{34}}
\newlabel{cfmc1}{{13}{34}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {14}{\ignorespaces The differential cross section for production of one central and one forward jet shown as a function of $z_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$, $\qopname  \relax o{log}_{10}(\beta )$ and $|\Delta \phi ^*|$. For more details see figure 13\hbox {}.}}{35}}
\newlabel{cfmc2}{{14}{35}}