\relax 
\citation{zeusdstar98,h1dstar98,h1dstar06}
\citation{zeusdstar98,zeusdstarjets03,zeusdstarjets05,h1dstar06}
\citation{h1dstarmu}
\citation{h1dstar06}
\citation{DGLAP}
\citation{CCFM}
\citation{uPDF}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{4}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}QCD Calculations}{4}}
\citation{Tung}
\citation{geant}
\citation{pythia}
\citation{lundstring}
\citation{bowler}
\citation{kartvelish}
\citation{Aaron:2008tt}
\citation{cteq6l}
\citation{grvlo}
\citation{cascade}
\citation{CCFM}
\citation{a0}
\citation{Frixione,FMNR}
\citation{Kramer,Kniehl2009}
\citation{mcatnlo_hera}
\citation{Frixione,FMNR}
\citation{Kramer,Kniehl2009}
\citation{mcatnlo_hera}
\citation{Frixione,FMNR}
\citation{cteq5f3}
\citation{Herapdf}
\citation{grvlo}
\citation{pdg10}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces  Fragmentation parameters $\alpha $ in the Kartvelishvili parameterisation used in the MC simulations. In the two regions of the invariant mass squared of the $c\mathaccentV {bar}016{c}$ pair, $\ensuremath  {\mathaccentV {hat}05E{s}}$, separated by the boundary $\ensuremath  {\mathaccentV {hat}05E{s}}_{threshold}$, two different values of $\alpha $ are used. }}{6}}
\newlabel{fragpar}{{1}{6}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces  Parameters and variations used in the NLO calculations of FMNR\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {Frixione,FMNR}, GMVFNS\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {Kramer, Kniehl2009} and MC@NLO\nobreakspace  {}\cite  {mcatnlo_hera}. }}{6}}
\newlabel{Tab_NLO_parameters}{{2}{6}}
\citation{Kramer,Kniehl2009}
\citation{KKK06}
\citation{Herapdf}
\citation{afg04}
\citation{Kniehl2009}
\citation{mcatnlo}
\citation{mcatnlo_hera}
\citation{herwig}
\citation{gladilin}
\citation{Herapdf}
\citation{grvlo}
\citation{h1detector}
\citation{cst}
\citation{mwpc}
\citation{ctdresolution}
\citation{ftt}
\citation{nik,andy}
\newlabel{mcatnlo-description}{{2}{7}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}H1 Detector}{7}}
\citation{h1testbeam}
\citation{spacal}
\citation{spacaltestbeam}
\citation{hadroo2}
\citation{andy}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Event Selection and Reconstruction}{8}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.1}\relax \mathversion  {bold}Inclusive \ensuremath  {D^*}\ Sample}{8}}
\citation{jacquetblondel}
\citation{pdg10}
\citation{pdg10}
\citation{deltammethod}
\citation{pdg10}
\citation{Gaiser}
\citation{Granet}
\citation{Verkerke}
\citation{thesis_eva}
\citation{jetKT93}
\citation{thesis_zlatka}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}\relax \mathversion  {bold}\ensuremath  {D^*}-tagged dijet\ Sample}{10}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Cross Section Determination and Systematic Errors}{10}}
\newlabel{eq:crossec}{{1}{10}}
\citation{h1dstardis}
\citation{rapgap}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Definition of the kinematic range of the measurements.  }}{11}}
\newlabel{tab:kinrange}{{3}{11}}
\citation{pdg10}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}\relax \mathversion  {bold}Results for Inclusive \ensuremath  {D^*}\ Meson Production}{12}}
\citation{epa}
\citation{h1dstardis}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Summary of all sources of systematic uncertainties and their effect on the total \ensuremath  {D^*}\ and the \ensuremath  {D^*}-tagged dijet\ production cross section with the breakdown into sources leading to bin-to-bin uncorrelated uncertainties and sources leading to normalisation uncertainties. }}{13}}
\newlabel{tab:sysError}{{4}{13}}
\citation{zeusdstar98,h1dstar06}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}\relax \mathversion  {bold}Results for \ensuremath  {D^*}\ Tagged Dijet Production}{14}}
\newlabel{eq:totXsecDstarjet}{{4}{14}}
\citation{h1dstar06}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {8}Conclusions}{16}}
\bibcite{zeusdstar98}{1}
\bibcite{h1dstar98}{2}
\bibcite{h1dstar06}{3}
\bibcite{zeusdstarjets03}{4}
\bibcite{zeusdstarjets05}{5}
\bibcite{h1dstarmu}{6}
\bibcite{DGLAP}{7}
\bibcite{CCFM}{8}
\bibcite{uPDF}{9}
\bibcite{Tung}{10}
\bibcite{geant}{11}
\bibcite{pythia}{12}
\bibcite{lundstring}{13}
\bibcite{bowler}{14}
\bibcite{kartvelish}{15}
\bibcite{Aaron:2008tt}{16}
\bibcite{cteq6l}{17}
\bibcite{grvlo}{18}
\bibcite{cascade}{19}
\bibcite{a0}{20}
\bibcite{Frixione}{21}
\bibcite{FMNR}{22}
\bibcite{Herapdf}{23}
\bibcite{cteq5f3}{24}
\bibcite{pdg10}{25}
\bibcite{Kramer}{26}
\bibcite{Kniehl2009}{27}
\bibcite{KKK06}{28}
\bibcite{afg04}{29}
\bibcite{mcatnlo}{30}
\bibcite{mcatnlo_hera}{31}
\bibcite{herwig}{32}
\bibcite{gladilin}{33}
\bibcite{h1detector}{34}
\bibcite{cst}{35}
\bibcite{mwpc}{36}
\bibcite{ctdresolution}{37}
\bibcite{ftt}{38}
\bibcite{nik}{39}
\bibcite{andy}{40}
\bibcite{h1testbeam}{41}
\bibcite{spacal}{42}
\bibcite{spacaltestbeam}{43}
\bibcite{hadroo2}{44}
\bibcite{jacquetblondel}{45}
\bibcite{deltammethod}{46}
\bibcite{Gaiser}{47}
\bibcite{Granet}{48}
\bibcite{Verkerke}{49}
\bibcite{thesis_eva}{50}
\bibcite{jetKT93}{51}
\bibcite{thesis_zlatka}{52}
\bibcite{h1dstardis}{53}
\bibcite{rapgap}{54}
\bibcite{epa}{55}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Bin averaged single differential cross sections for inclusive \ensuremath  {D^*}\ production in bins of \ensuremath  {p_T(\ensuremath  {D^*})}, \ensuremath  {\eta (\ensuremath  {D^*})}, \ensuremath  {W_{\gamma p}}\ and \ensuremath  {z(\ensuremath  {D^*})}\ with their statistical and uncorrelated systematic uncertainties. The normalisation uncertainty of $6.0\%$ is not included.}}{21}}
\newlabel{tab:cssd}{{5}{21}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Bin averaged double differential cross sections for inclusive \ensuremath  {D^*}\ production in bins of \ensuremath  {\eta (\ensuremath  {D^*})}\ for three ranges in \ensuremath  {p_T(\ensuremath  {D^*})}\ with their statistical and uncorrelated systematic uncertainties. The normalisation uncertainty of $6.0\%$ is not included.}}{22}}
\newlabel{tab:csdd}{{6}{22}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Bin averaged single differential cross sections for \ensuremath  {D^*}-tagged dijet\ production in bins of $\eta $ and \ensuremath  {p_T}\ of the \ensuremath  {\ensuremath  {D^*}\ \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {jet}}\ and the {\ensuremath  {\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {other }\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {jet}}}\ with their statistical and uncorrelated systematic uncertainties. The normalisation uncertainty of $6.0\%$ is not included.}}{23}}
\newlabel{tab:diffXsecdijet}{{7}{23}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Bin averaged single differential cross sections for \ensuremath  {D^*}-tagged dijet\ production in bins of $\Delta \eta $, $|\Delta \varphi |$, \ensuremath  {x_\gamma }\ and $M_X$ with their statistical and uncorrelated systematic uncertainties. The normalisation uncertainty of $6.0\%$ is not included.}}{24}}
\newlabel{tab:diffXsecdijetcorr}{{8}{24}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces Bin averaged single differential cross sections for \ensuremath  {D^*}-tagged dijet\ production in bins of $|\Delta \varphi |$ in two regions of \ensuremath  {x_\gamma }\ with their statistical and uncorrelated systematic uncertainties. The normalisation uncertainty of $6.0\%$ is not included.}}{25}}
\newlabel{tab:diffXsecXgammaDphi}{{9}{25}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Distribution of $\Delta M$ for \ensuremath  {D^*}\ candidates a) in the inclusive \ensuremath  {D^*}\ sample and b) in the \ensuremath  {D^*}\ tagged dijet sample. The fit function is also shown.}}{26}}
\newlabel{signal}{{1}{26}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Single differential \ensuremath  {D^*}\ cross section as a function of \ensuremath  {p_T(\ensuremath  {D^*})}, \ensuremath  {\eta (\ensuremath  {D^*})}, \ensuremath  {W_{\gamma p}}, and \ensuremath  {z(\ensuremath  {D^*})}\ compared to {\scshape  Pythia}\ and {\scshape  Cascade}\ predictions. Here and in the following figures the inner error bar depicts the statistical error and the outer shows the statistical, and uncorrelated systematic and normalisation uncertainty added in quadrature. The normalised ratio \ensuremath  {R^{\rm  norm}}\ (see text) is also shown.}}{27}}
\newlabel{singlediff}{{2}{27}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Single differential \ensuremath  {D^*}\ cross section as a function of \ensuremath  {p_T(\ensuremath  {D^*})}, \ensuremath  {\eta (\ensuremath  {D^*})}, \ensuremath  {W_{\gamma p}}, and \ensuremath  {z(\ensuremath  {D^*})}\ compared to the next-to-leading order predictions of FMNR, GMVFNS and MC@NLO. The normalised ratio \ensuremath  {R^{\rm  norm}}\ (see text) is also shown.}}{28}}
\newlabel{singlediff_NLO}{{3}{28}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Double differential \ensuremath  {D^*}\ cross section as a function of \ensuremath  {\eta (\ensuremath  {D^*})}\ for three bins of \ensuremath  {p_T(\ensuremath  {D^*})}\ compared to {\scshape  Pythia}\ and {\scshape  Cascade}\ predictions.}}{29}}
\newlabel{ddiff}{{4}{29}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Double differential \ensuremath  {D^*}\ cross section as a function of \ensuremath  {\eta (\ensuremath  {D^*})}\ for three bins of \ensuremath  {p_T(\ensuremath  {D^*})}\ compared to the next-to-leading order predictions of FMNR, GMVFNS and MC@NLO.}}{30}}
\newlabel{ddiff_NLO}{{5}{30}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Single differential cross section for \ensuremath  {D^*}-tagged dijet\ production as a function of $\ensuremath  {p_T}$ and $\eta $ of the \ensuremath  {\ensuremath  {D^*}\ \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {jet}}\ and the {\ensuremath  {\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {other }\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {jet}}}\ compared to {\scshape  Pythia}\ and {\scshape  Cascade}\ predictions. The normalised ratio \ensuremath  {R^{\rm  norm}}\ (see text) is also shown.}}{31}}
\newlabel{fig:dstardijet}{{6}{31}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Single differential cross section for \ensuremath  {D^*}-tagged dijet\ production as a function of $\ensuremath  {p_T}$ and $\eta $ of the \ensuremath  {\ensuremath  {D^*}\ \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {jet}}\ and the {\ensuremath  {\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {other }\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {jet}}}\ compared to MC@NLO predictions. The normalised ratio \ensuremath  {R^{\rm  norm}}\ (see text) is also shown. }}{32}}
\newlabel{fig:dstardijet-mcatnlo}{{7}{32}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Single differential cross section for \ensuremath  {D^*}-tagged dijet\ production as a function of the difference in pseudorapidity $\Delta \eta $ and in azimuthal angle $\Delta \varphi $ between the {\ensuremath  {\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {other }\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {jet}}}\ and the \ensuremath  {\ensuremath  {D^*}\ \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {jet}}, the mass $M_X$ and $\ensuremath  {x_\gamma }$ compared to {\scshape  Pythia}\ and {\scshape  Cascade}\ predictions. The normalised ratio \ensuremath  {R^{\rm  norm}}\ (see text) is also shown.}}{33}}
\newlabel{fig:dstardijet-corr}{{8}{33}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces Single differential cross section for \ensuremath  {D^*}-tagged dijet\ production as a function of the difference in pseudorapidity $\Delta \eta $ and in azimuthal angle $\Delta \varphi $ between the {\ensuremath  {\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {other }\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {jet}}}\ and the \ensuremath  {\ensuremath  {D^*}\ \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {jet}}, the mass $M_X$ and $\ensuremath  {x_\gamma }$ compared to MC@NLO predictions. The normalised ratio \ensuremath  {R^{\rm  norm}}\ (see text) is also shown.}}{34}}
\newlabel{fig:dstardijet-corr-mcatnlo}{{9}{34}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces Single differential cross section for \ensuremath  {D^*}-tagged dijet\ production as a function of the difference in azimuthal angle $\Delta \varphi $ in two regions of $\ensuremath  {x_\gamma }$ compared to predictions of {\scshape  Pythia}, {\scshape  Cascade}\ and MC@NLO. The normalised ratio \ensuremath  {R^{\rm  norm}}\ (see text) is also shown.}}{35}}
\newlabel{fig:dstardijet-corr-2d}{{10}{35}}