\relax 
\citation{Bethe:1934za}
\citation{qedctheory}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{4}}
\newlabel{eqn:intlumi}{{2}{4}}
\citation{Ahmed:1995cf}
\citation{Aktas:2004ek}
\citation{H1detector}
\citation{spacal}
\citation{spacaltest}
\citation{Glazov:2010zza}
\citation{Pitzl:2000wz}
\citation{Becker:2007ms}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}H1 Detector}{5}}
\citation{geant}
\citation{Glazov:2010zza}
\citation{compton22}
\citation{Mucke:1999yb}
\citation{Sjostrand:2000wi}
\citation{Abe:2000cv}
\citation{milou}
\citation{diffvm}
\citation{rapgap}
\citation{Schuler:1991yg}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Signal and Background processes}{6}}
\citation{Glazov:2010zza}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Event selection}{7}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces  Summary of selection criteria.}}{8}}
\newlabel{tab:cuts}{{1}{8}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces  Background processes contributing to the elastic QEDC selection. The background fractions are given for both a selection with the $\delimiter "026A30C \mathaccentV {vec}17E{P}_T^{\text  {miss}}\delimiter "026A30C $ cut released and for the final selection. }}{9}}
\newlabel{tab:bgr}{{2}{9}}
\citation{Collaboration:2010ry}
\citation{Bentvelsen:1992fu,Hoeger:1991wj}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Systematic uncertainties}{10}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}Trigger uncertainties}{10}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}Reconstruction uncertainties}{10}}
\citation{Collaboration:2010ry}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces  Systematic uncertainties on the determination of the integrated luminosity using elastic QEDC events. The different error sources are grouped into three categories: experimental, background related and theory related uncertainties. The error sources are described in detail in the text.}}{11}}
\newlabel{tab:syst}{{3}{11}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3}Background uncertainties}{13}}
\citation{:2009vda}
\citation{peakingisr}
\citation{Anlauf:1991vi}
\citation{Montagna:1991ku}
\citation{Arrington:2007ux}
\citation{arringtonprivate}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.4}QEDC theory uncertainties}{14}}
\citation{Collaboration:2010ry}
\citation{Collaboration:2010ry}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.5}Time-dependent uncertainties}{15}}
\bibcite{Bethe:1934za}{1}
\bibcite{qedctheory}{2}
\bibcite{Ahmed:1995cf}{3}
\bibcite{Aktas:2004ek}{4}
\bibcite{H1detector}{5}
\bibcite{spacal}{6}
\bibcite{spacaltest}{7}
\bibcite{Glazov:2010zza}{8}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Results}{16}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Conclusions}{16}}
\bibcite{Pitzl:2000wz}{9}
\bibcite{Becker:2007ms}{10}
\bibcite{geant}{11}
\bibcite{compton22}{12}
\bibcite{Mucke:1999yb}{13}
\bibcite{Sjostrand:2000wi}{14}
\bibcite{Abe:2000cv}{15}
\bibcite{milou}{16}
\bibcite{diffvm}{17}
\bibcite{rapgap}{18}
\bibcite{Schuler:1991yg}{19}
\bibcite{Collaboration:2010ry}{20}
\bibcite{Bentvelsen:1992fu}{21}
\bibcite{Hoeger:1991wj}{22}
\bibcite{:2009vda}{23}
\bibcite{peakingisr}{24}
\bibcite{Anlauf:1991vi}{25}
\bibcite{Montagna:1991ku}{26}
\bibcite{Arrington:2007ux}{27}
\bibcite{arringtonprivate}{28}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Elastic QEDC candidate event observed in the H1 detector. The H1 detector components most relevant to this analysis are indicated. The approximate electron and photon candidate trajectories are shown.}}{19}}
\newlabel{fig:event}{{1}{19}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces  Distributions of variables used to select elastic QEDC events: (a--e) kinematic quantities of the selected electron-photon pair and (f) the $z$ coordinate of the position of the interaction. The kinematic quantities are (a) the minimum polar angle, (b) the maximum polar angle, (c) the minimum energy, (d) the maximum energy and (e) the modulus of their total transverse momentum. The data are shown as black dots with the statistical uncertainties indicated as vertical bars. The simulation including background, normalised to the integrated luminosity determined in this analysis, is indicated as a solid line, with the systematic uncertainties attached as shaded area. Also shown is the contribution from background. The hatched areas are excluded by the selection criteria.}}{20}}
\newlabel{fig:selection}{{2}{20}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces  Distributions of the ratio of measured to predicted transverse momentum for (a) electrons and (b) photons. The predicted transverse momentum $P_{T,DA}$ is calculated using the double angle method. The data are shown as black dots. The simulation including background, normalised to the integrated luminosity as determined in this analysis, is shown as a solid line, with the systematic uncertainty originating from the limited knowledge of the energy resolution attached as a shaded area. Also shown is the contribution from background processes.}}{21}}
\newlabel{fig:calibration}{{3}{21}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces  Distributions of the difference in azimuth between the electron and the photon. In (a) the event counts are shown, whereas in (b) the ratio to the expectation is drawn. The data are shown as black dots with statistical uncertainties indicated as vertical bars. The simulation including background, normalised to the integrated luminosity as determined in this analysis, is shown as a solid line with the systematic uncertainty originating from the limited knowledge of the position resolution attached as a shaded area. The distribution predicted by the simulation prior to adjusting the position resolution is shown by the dashed line.}}{21}}
\newlabel{fig:posres}{{4}{21}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces  Distributions of components of the photon plus electron transverse momentum sum, $\mathaccentV {vec}17E{P}_T^{\text  {sum}}$: (a) and (c) the component perpendicular to the electron transverse momentum, (b) and (d) the component parallel to the electron transverse momentum. The upper row, (a) and (b) shows the distributions inside the analysis phase space, the lower row (c) and (d) shows the distributions for $\delimiter "026A30C \mathaccentV {vec}17E{P}_T^{\text  {miss}}\delimiter "026A30C >0.3\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}\text  {GeV}$. The data are shown as black dots with the statistical uncertainties indicated as vertical bars. The simulation including background, normalised to the integrated luminosity as determined in this analysis, is indicated as a solid line, with the systematic uncertainties attached as shaded area. Also shown are the contributions from non-elastic QEDC and from other background sources.}}{22}}
\newlabel{fig:ptcomponents}{{5}{22}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces  Distribution of the variable $(E-p_z)/{2E^{e}_0}$ calculated from the sum of the electron and photon four-momenta. In (a) the event counts are shown, whereas in (b) the ratio of data to expectation is drawn. The data are shown as black dots with the statistical uncertainties indicated as vertical bars. The simulation including background, normalised to the integrated luminosity as determined in this analysis, is indicated as a solid line, with various components of the systematic uncertainties attached as shaded areas.}}{23}}
\newlabel{fig:epz}{{6}{23}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces  Integrated luminosity measured from elastic QEDC events in bins of approximately $25\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}\text  {pb}^{-1}$, divided by the integrated luminosity derived from the QEDC analysis on the full sample with time-dependent corrections applied. The statistical uncertainties of the binned QEDC analysis as well as the uncertainties of the time-dependent corrections, here applied to four data taking periods (I)--(IV), are indicated.}}{23}}
\newlabel{fig:yield}{{7}{23}}