\relax 
\citation{h196,zeusdstar97,h1gluon,zd97,h1f2c,zd00,h1dmesons,h1vertex05,h1ltt_hera1,h1dstar_hera1,zeusdmesons,zd0dp,zmu,h1ltt_hera2,h1dstarhighQ2,zeusdpluslambda,h1cbjets,h1dstar_hera2}
\citation{riemersma,gjr,ct10f3,mstw08f3,abm11}
\citation{zmvfns,acot,bmsn,s_acot_chi,rt_std,FONLL,fonllb_and_c,rt_opt}
\citation{h196,zeusdstar97,zd97,h1f2c,zd00,h1dstar_hera1,zeusdmesons,zd0dp,h1dstarhighQ2,h1dstar_hera2}
\citation{h1dmesons,h1vertex05,h1ltt_hera1,zd0dp,h1ltt_hera2}
\citation{zmu}
\citation{h1ltt_hera1,h1dstar_hera1,h1ltt_hera2,h1dstarhighQ2,h1dstar_hera2}
\citation{zd97,zd00,zd0dp,zmu}
\citation{glazov,H1comb,DIScomb}
\citation{DIScomb}
\citation{ABKMMSbar}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{8}}
\citation{daum_fl}
\citation{FONLL}
\citation{CTEQNNLO}
\citation{FONLL,rt_std,MSTWF2}
\citation{FONLL}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Open charm production in DIS}{9}}
\newlabel{sect:theory}{{2}{9}}
\citation{zmvfns}
\citation{bmsn}
\citation{h1dstarhighQ2,h1dstar_hera2}
\citation{riemersma}
\citation{abm11,gjr,ct10f3,mstw08f3}
\citation{riemersma}
\citation{hvqdis}
\citation{riemersma,hvqdis}
\citation{pdg}
\citation{ABKMMSbar}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.1}Zero Mass Variable Flavour Number Scheme}{10}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2}Fixed Flavour Number Scheme}{10}}
\citation{mc_run}
\citation{FONLL,rt_std,bmsn,acot,s_acot_chi,rt_opt,fonllb_and_c}
\citation{h1}
\citation{zeus}
\citation{H1cst}
\citation{ZEUSmvd}
\citation{zd97,zd00,h1dstar_hera1,zd0dp,h1dstarhighQ2,h1dstar_hera2}
\citation{h1ltt_hera2}
\citation{zmu}
\citation{h1ltt_hera2}
\citation{zd00}
\citation{zmu}
\citation{heracles}
\citation{pdg}
\newlabel{eq:mrunpol}{{3}{11}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3}General Mass Variable Flavour Number Scheme}{11}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Combination of H1 and ZEUS measurements}{11}}
\newlabel{Sect:combination}{{3}{11}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Data samples}{11}}
\newlabel{sect:samples}{{3.1}{11}}
\citation{riemersma}
\citation{hvqdis}
\citation{DIScomb}
\citation{riemersma,hvqdis}
\citation{DIScomb}
\citation{h1frag}
\citation{zeusdmesons}
\citation{kart}
\citation{h1frag,zeusdmesons}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Extraction of \relax \mathversion  {bold}$\sigma _{\rm  red}^{c\mathaccentV {bar}016{c}}\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} $\relax \mathversion  {normal}from visible cross sections}{12}}
\newlabel{sect:extract}{{3.2}{12}}
\newlabel{formel_ftc}{{4}{12}}
\citation{cacciari}
\citation{belle}
\citation{ptkink}
\citation{lohrmann}
\citation{pdg}
\citation{cleo}
\citation{h1ltt_hera2}
\citation{riemersma}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.3}Common $\boldsymbol  {x-Q^2}$ grid}{13}}
\citation{glazov,DIScomb}
\citation{webpage}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.4}Combination method}{14}}
\newlabel{sect:combine}{{3.4}{14}}
\newlabel{eq:ave}{{5}{14}}
\newlabel{eq:tot}{{6}{14}}
\citation{DIScomb}
\citation{webpage}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Combined charm cross sections}{15}}
\newlabel{sect:results}{{4}{15}}
\citation{rt_std}
\citation{rt_opt}
\citation{ref:HERAPDF1.5}
\citation{DIScomb}
\citation{DIScomb}
\citation{FONLL}
\citation{fonllb_and_c}
\citation{fonllb_and_c}
\citation{ct10f3,ct12nnlo}
\citation{ABKMMSbar,abkm}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Comparison to theoretical predictions}{16}}
\newlabel{sect:comparisons}{{5}{16}}
\citation{DIScomb}
\citation{herafitter}
\citation{dglap}
\citation{qcdnum}
\citation{fsnu}
\citation{rt_std}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}QCD analysis}{17}}
\newlabel{sect:qcdana}{{6}{17}}
\newlabel{puv}{{8}{17}}
\newlabel{pdv}{{9}{17}}
\newlabel{pD}{{11}{17}}
\citation{pdg}
\citation{fsatlas}
\newlabel{mcfit}{{12}{18}}
\citation{acot}
\citation{s_acot_chi}
\citation{FONLL}
\citation{rt_std}
\citation{rt_opt}
\citation{acot}
\citation{acot}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.1}Extraction of {\relax \mathversion  {bold}\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$M_c^{\rm  opt}$}} in the VFNS}{19}}
\newlabel{mcvfns}{{6.1}{19}}
\citation{ABKMMSbar}
\citation{abm11,openqcdrad}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.2}Impact of the charm data on PDFs}{20}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.3}Measurement of the charm quark mass}{20}}
\citation{pdg}
\citation{ABKMMSbar,adlm}
\citation{mcfm}
\citation{applgrid}
\newlabel{eqn:mcrun}{{13}{21}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.4}Impact of charm data on predictions for {\relax \mathversion  {bold}$W^\pm $} and {\relax \mathversion  {bold}$Z$\relax \mathversion  {normal}} production at the LHC}{21}}
\bibcite{h196}{1}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Conclusions}{22}}
\newlabel{sect:conclude}{{7}{22}}
\bibcite{zeusdstar97}{2}
\bibcite{h1gluon}{3}
\bibcite{zd97}{4}
\bibcite{h1f2c}{5}
\bibcite{zd00}{6}
\bibcite{h1dmesons}{7}
\bibcite{h1vertex05}{8}
\bibcite{h1ltt_hera1}{9}
\bibcite{h1dstar_hera1}{10}
\bibcite{zeusdmesons}{11}
\bibcite{zd0dp}{12}
\bibcite{zmu}{13}
\bibcite{h1ltt_hera2}{14}
\bibcite{h1dstarhighQ2}{15}
\bibcite{zeusdpluslambda}{16}
\bibcite{h1cbjets}{17}
\bibcite{h1dstar_hera2}{18}
\bibcite{riemersma}{19}
\bibcite{abm11}{20}
\bibcite{gjr}{21}
\bibcite{ct10f3}{22}
\bibcite{mstw08f3}{23}
\bibcite{zmvfns}{24}
\bibcite{acot}{25}
\bibcite{bmsn}{26}
\bibcite{s_acot_chi}{27}
\bibcite{rt_std}{28}
\bibcite{FONLL}{29}
\bibcite{fonllb_and_c}{30}
\bibcite{rt_opt}{31}
\bibcite{glazov}{32}
\bibcite{H1comb}{33}
\bibcite{DIScomb}{34}
\bibcite{ABKMMSbar}{35}
\bibcite{daum_fl}{36}
\bibcite{CTEQNNLO}{37}
\bibcite{MSTWF2}{38}
\bibcite{hvqdis}{39}
\bibcite{pdg}{40}
\bibcite{mc_run}{41}
\bibcite{h1}{42}
\bibcite{zeus}{43}
\bibcite{H1cst}{44}
\bibcite{ZEUSmvd}{45}
\bibcite{heracles}{46}
\bibcite{h1frag}{47}
\bibcite{kart}{48}
\bibcite{cacciari}{49}
\bibcite{belle}{50}
\bibcite{ptkink}{51}
\bibcite{lohrmann}{52}
\bibcite{cleo}{53}
\bibcite{webpage}{54}
\bibcite{ref:HERAPDF1.5}{55}
\bibcite{ct12nnlo}{56}
\bibcite{abkm}{57}
\bibcite{herafitter}{58}
\bibcite{dglap}{59}
\bibcite{qcdnum}{60}
\bibcite{fsnu}{61}
\bibcite{fsatlas}{62}
\bibcite{openqcdrad}{63}
\bibcite{adlm}{64}
\bibcite{mcfm}{65}
\bibcite{applgrid}{66}
\citation{h1ltt_hera2}
\citation{h1dstar_hera1}
\citation{h1dstar_hera2}
\citation{h1dstarhighQ2}
\citation{zd97}
\citation{zd00}
\citation{zd0dp}
\citation{zd0dp}
\citation{zmu}
\citation{h1frag}
\citation{h1frag}
\citation{zeusdmesons}
\citation{rt_std}
\citation{h196,zd97,h1f2c,zd00,h1vertex05,h1ltt_hera1,zeusdmesons}
\citation{rt_opt}
\citation{ref:HERAPDF1.5}
\citation{fonllb_and_c}
\citation{zd97,h1f2c,zd00,zd0dp,zmu,h1dstarhighQ2,h1dstar_hera2}
\citation{ct10f3}
\citation{zd97,h1f2c,zd00,h1vertex05,h1ltt_hera1}
\citation{ct12nnlo}
\citation{abkm}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Data sets used in the combination. For each data set the charm tagging method, the $Q^2$ range, the number of cross section measurements $N$ and the integrated luminosity ${\cal  L}$ are given. The data set with the $D^{0,{\rm  no}D^{*+}}$ tagging method is based on an analysis of $D^{0}\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} $\nobreakspace  {}mesons not originating from detectable $D^{*+}$ decays. Charge conjugate modes are always implied. }}{27}}
\newlabel{t:sets}{{1}{27}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces The $\alpha _K$ parameters used for the longitudinal fragmentation into $D^*$ mesons and in ground state (g.s.) charmed hadrons. The first column shows the $\mathaccentV {hat}05E{s}$ range in which a particular value of $\alpha _K$ is used, with $\mathaccentV {hat}05E{s}_1=70\pm 40$\nobreakspace  {}GeV$^2$ and $\mathaccentV {hat}05E{s}_2=324$\nobreakspace  {}GeV$^2$. The variations of $\alpha _K$ are given in the second and third column. The parameter $\mathaccentV {hat}05E{s}_2$ is not varied, since the corresponding uncertainty is already covered by the $\alpha _K$ variations. }}{27}}
\newlabel{t:kart}{{2}{27}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Charm fragmentation fractions to charmed mesons and the charm branching fraction to muons. }}{27}}
\newlabel{t:ff}{{3}{27}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces The averaged reduced cross section of charm production, $\sigma _{\rm  red}^{c\mathaccentV {bar}016{c}}\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} $, as obtained from the combination of H1 and ZEUS measurements. The values of the cross section are presented together with uncorrelated ($\delta _{unc}$) correlated ($\delta _{cor}$) and procedural ($\delta _{proced}$) uncertainties. The total uncertainty ($\delta _{tot}$) is obtained by adding the correlated, uncorrelated and procedural errors in quadrature.}}{28}}
\newlabel{tab:result}{{4}{28}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces continued}}{29}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Sources of bin-to-bin correlated systematic uncertainties considered in the combination. For each source the shifts in units of standard deviations $\sigma $ and the reduction factor of the uncertainty values are given. The systematic sources corresponding to the extrapolation uncertainties are highlighted in bold font. The second column shows the data sets (see table 1\hbox {}) affected by each particular source.}}{30}}
\newlabel{tab:systematic_shifts}{{5}{30}}
\newlabel{RF1}{{4}{31}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Calculations from different theory groups as shown in figures\nobreakspace  {}5\hbox {}-8\hbox {}. The table shows the heavy flavour scheme used and the corresponding reference, the respective $F_{2(L)}$ definition (section 2\hbox {}), the value and type of charm mass used (equation (3\hbox {})), the order in $\alpha _S$ of the massive and massless parts of the calculation, the value of $\alpha _s$, the renormalisation and factorisation scale, and which HERA charm data were included in the corresponding PDF fit. The distinction between the two possible $F_{2(L)}$ definitions is not applicable (n.a.) for ${\cal  O}(\alpha _s)$ calculations.}}{31}}
\newlabel{tab:theories}{{6}{31}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces  The values of the charm mass parameter \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$M_c^{\rm  opt}$}\ as determined from the \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$M_c$}\ scans in different heavy flavour schemes. The uncertainties of the minimisation procedure are denoted as `exp', the model and parameterisation uncertainties are represented by `mod' and `param', respectively. Also the uncertainty due to $\alpha _s$ variation is listed. The corresponding global and partial $\chi ^2$ are presented per degrees of freedom $n_{\text  {dof}}$ and per number of data points $n_{\text  {dp}}$, respectively. }}{32}}
\newlabel{tab:mco}{{7}{32}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces NLO VFNS predictions for $Z/W^\pm $ cross sections at the LHC for $\sqrt  {s}=7$ TeV using the MCFM program. The calculations are based on the PDF sets extracted in the corresponding schemes from the HERA data using \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$M_c^{\rm  opt}$}\nobreakspace  {} for the charm quark mass parameter. The listed cross section uncertainties correspond to the uncertainties on \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$M_c^{\rm  opt}$}\nobreakspace  {}only.}}{32}}
\newlabel{tab:WZ_cross_sections}{{8}{32}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Pull distribution for the combined data samples (shaded histogram). RMS gives the root mean square of the distribution. The curve shows the result of a binned log-likelihood Gaussian fit.}}{33}}
\newlabel{fig:pull}{{1}{33}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Combined reduced cross sections $\sigma _{\rm  red}^{c\mathaccentV {bar}016{c}}\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} $as a function of $x$ for fixed values of $Q^2$. The error bars represent the total uncertainty including uncorrelated, correlated and procedural uncertainties added in quadrature.}}{34}}
\newlabel{fig:combined}{{2}{34}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Combined reduced cross sections $\sigma _{\rm  red}^{c\mathaccentV {bar}016{c}}\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} $(filled circles) as a function of $x$ for fixed values of $Q^2$. The error bars represent the total uncertainty including uncorrelated, correlated and procedural uncertainties added in quadrature. For comparison, the input data are shown: the H1 measurement based on lifetime information of inclusive track production is represented by closed squares; the H1 measurements based on reconstruction of $D^*$ mesons in HERA-I / HERA-II running periods are denoted by filled up (down) triangles; the ZEUS measurement using semileptonic decays into muons is represented by open circles; the ZEUS measurements based on reconstruction of $D^*$ mesons are depicted by open squares (open triangles) for data collected in 1998-2000 (1996-1997) years; the ZEUS measurements based on reconstruction of $D^0$ ($D^+$) mesons are shown by open diamonds (crosses). For presentation purpose each individual measurement is shifted in $x$.}}{35}}
\newlabel{fig:combined_vs_input}{{3}{35}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Combined reduced cross sections $\sigma _{\rm  red}^{c\mathaccentV {bar}016{c}}\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} $(filled circles) as a function of $x$ for $Q^2=18$ GeV$^2$. The error bars represent the total uncertainty including uncorrelated, correlated and procedural uncertainties added in quadrature. For comparison, the input data are shown. For further details see figure 3\hbox {}.}}{36}}
\newlabel{fig:combined_vs_input_zoom}{{4}{36}}
\newlabel{RF2}{{4}{37}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Combined reduced cross sections $\sigma _{\rm  red}^{c\mathaccentV {bar}016{c}}\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} $(filled circles) as a function of $x$ for fixed values of $Q^2$. The error bars represent the total uncertainty including uncorrelated, correlated and procedural uncertainties added in quadrature. The data are compared to MSTW predictions at NLO (left panel) and NNLO (right panel). The predictions obtained using the standard (optimised) parametrisation are represented by the shaded bands (solid lines). The uncertainties for the optimised parametrisation are not yet available.}}{37}}
\newlabel{fig:combined_mstw}{{5}{37}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Combined reduced cross sections $\sigma _{\rm  red}^{c\mathaccentV {bar}016{c}}\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} $(filled circles) as a function of $x$ for fixed values of $Q^2$. The error bars represent the total uncertainty including uncorrelated, correlated and procedural uncertainties added in quadrature. The data are compared to the NLO predictions based on HERAPDF1.5 extracted in the RT standard scheme. The line represents the prediction using $\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$M_c$}=1.4$\nobreakspace  {}GeV. The uncertainty band shows the full PDF uncertainty which is dominated by the variation of \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$M_c$}.}}{38}}
\newlabel{fig:combined_HERAPDF1.5}{{6}{38}}
\newlabel{RF3}{{4}{39}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Combined reduced cross sections $\sigma _{\rm  red}^{c\mathaccentV {bar}016{c}}\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} $(filled circles) as a function of $x$ for fixed values of $Q^2$. The error bars represent the total uncertainty including uncorrelated, correlated and procedural uncertainties added in quadrature. The data are compared to predictions by the NNPDF group (left panel) and the CTEQ group (right panel). The predictions from NNPDF2.1 in FONNL-A, -B and -C schemes are shown with their uncertainties (bands with different hatch styles). The CT10 NLO prediction with its uncertainties is shown by the shaded bands. The uncertainties on the CT10 NNLO (prel.) predictions are not yet available.}}{39}}
\newlabel{fig:combined_nnpdf_ct}{{7}{39}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Combined reduced cross sections $\sigma _{\rm  red}^{c\mathaccentV {bar}016{c}}\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} $(filled circles) as a function of $x$ for fixed values of $Q^2$. The error bars represent the total uncertainty including uncorrelated, correlated and procedural uncertainties added in quadrature. The data are compared to predictions of the ABM group at NLO (hashed band) and NNLO (shaded band) in FFNS using the $\overline  {\text  {MS}}$ definition for the charm quark mass.}}{40}}
\newlabel{fig:combined_abkm}{{8}{40}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces The values of $\chi ^2(M_c)$ for the PDF fit to the combined HERA DIS data in the RT standard scheme. The open symbols indicate the results of the fit to inclusive DIS data only. The results of the fit including the combined charm data are shown by filled symbols.}}{41}}
\newlabel{fig:rtstd}{{9}{41}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces The values of $\chi ^2(M_c)$ for the PDF fit to the combined HERA inclusive DIS and charm measurements. Different heavy flavour schemes are used in the fit and presented by lines with different styles. The values of $\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$M_c^{\rm  opt}$}$ for each scheme are indicated by the stars.}}{42}}
\newlabel{fig:scharmscan_allschemes}{{10}{42}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces Combined measurements of $\sigma _{\rm  red}^{c\mathaccentV {bar}016{c}}\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} $as a function of $x$ for given values of $Q^2$ is shown by filled symbols. The error bars represent the total uncertainty including uncorrelated, correlated and procedural uncertainties added in quadrature. The data are compared to the results of the fit using different variants of the VFNS (represented by lines of different styles) choosing $M_C=\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$M_c^{\rm  opt}$}$. The cross section prediction of the ZM-VFNS vanishes for $Q^{2}=2.5\nobreakspace  {}GeV^2$. }}{43}}
\newlabel{fig:data5}{{11}{43}}
\newlabel{RF4}{{4}{44}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {12}{\ignorespaces Parton density functions $x\cdot f(x,Q^2)$ with $f=g,u_v,d_v,\overline  {u},\overline  {d},\overline  {s},\overline  {c}$ for (a) valence quarks and gluon and for (b) sea anti-quarks obtained from the combined QCD analysis of the inclusive DIS data and $\sigma _{\rm  red}^{c\mathaccentV {bar}016{c}}\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em} $(dark shaded bands) in the RT optimised scheme as a function of $x$ at $Q^2=10$ GeV$^2$. For comparison the results of the QCD analysis of the inclusive DIS data only are also shown (light shaded bands). The gluon distribution function is scaled by a factor $0.05$ and the $x\overline  {d}$ distribution function is scaled by a factor $1.1$ for better visibility. }}{44}}
\newlabel{fig:pdf1}{{12}{44}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {13}{\ignorespaces The values of $\chi ^2$ for the PDF fit to the combined HERA DIS data including charm measurements as a function of the running charm quark mass $m_c(m_c)$. The FFNS ABM scheme is used, where the charm quark mass is defined in the $\overline  {\text  {MS}}$ scheme.}}{45}}
\newlabel{fig:abm_scan}{{13}{45}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {14}{\ignorespaces NLO predictions for (a) $W^{+}$, (b) $W^{-}$ and (c) $Z$ production cross sections at the LHC for $\sqrt  {s}=7$ TeV as a function of $\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$M_c$}$ used in the corresponding PDF fit. The different lines represent predictions for different implementations of the VFNS. The predictions obtained with PDFs evaluated with the $\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$M_c^{\rm  opt}$}$ values for each scheme are indicated by the stars. The horizontal dashed lines show the resulting spread of the predictions when choosing $M_c=\unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$M_c^{\rm  opt}$}$.}}{46}}
\newlabel{fig:wp_cross_section}{{14}{46}}