\relax 
\citation{Engel:1998hf,Bunyatyan:2009zz}
\citation{Adloff:1998yg,Chekanov:2002pf,Chekanov:2007tv,Chekanov:2008tn,Aaron:2010ab,Aaron:2011pe}
\citation{Chekanov:2008tn,Aaron:2010ab}
\citation{Aaron:2011pe}
\citation{Benecke:1969sh,Chou:1994dh}
\citation{Feynman:1969ej}
\citation{Arnison:1982ed,Arnison:1982rm,Banner:1984wh,Bernard:1985kh,Alner:1986xu,Alner:1987wb,Alexopoulos:1988na,Abe:1989td,Aaron:2007ds,Abramowicz:2010rz}
\citation{Pare:1989mr}
\citation{Albrow:1973kj,Albrow:1973ee,Capiluppi:1973fz,Capiluppi:1974rt}
\citation{Ohsawa:1992dj}
\citation{Adloff:1998yg,Chekanov:2002pf,Chekanov:2007tv,Chekanov:2008tn,Aaron:2010ab,Aaron:2011pe}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{4}}
\citation{Abt:1996hi,Abt:1996xv,Appuhn:1996na,Pitzl:2000wz,Andrieu:1993kh,Laycock:2012xg}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces  (a) Generic diagram for forward photon or neutron production $ep\rightarrow e'\gamma X$, $ep\rightarrow e'nX$ in deep-inelastic scattering. (b) Diagram of forward neutron production via pion exchange.}}{5}}
\newlabel{diagram1}{{1}{5}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Experimental Procedure and Data Analysis}{5}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.1}H1 main detector}{5}}
\citation{Nicholls:1995di}
\citation{Aaron:2012kn}
\citation{Aaron:2010ab,Aaron:2011pe}
\citation{Aaron:2011pe}
\citation{Aaron:2010ab}
\citation{Uraev}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2}Forward detector for neutral particles}{6}}
\newlabel{sec:fncdet}{{2.2}{6}}
\citation{Aaron:2010ab,Aaron:2011pe}
\citation{Peez:2003zd,Hellwig:2004yp}
\citation{Adloff:1997sc}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3}Cross Section Definition}{7}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.4}Event selection }{7}}
\citation{Brun:1978fy}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Definition of the kinematic phase space of the measurements.}}{8}}
\newlabel{tab:selection}{{1}{8}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.5}Monte Carlo simulations and corrections to the data}{8}}
\newlabel{sec:mc}{{2.5}{8}}
\citation{Charchula:1994kf}
\citation{Ingelman:1996mq}
\citation{Lonnblad:1992tz}
\citation{Andersson:1983ia,Sjostrand:1995iq}
\citation{Kwiatkowski:1990es}
\citation{Edin:1995gi}
\citation{Aaron:2009kv}
\citation{Jung:1993gf}
\citation{Kwiatkowski:1990es}
\citation{Bishari:1972tx,Holtmann:1994rs,Kopeliovich:1996iw,Przybycien:1996zb,Szczurek:1997cw}
\citation{Holtmann:1994rs}
\citation{Aaron:2010ab}
\citation{Aaron:2010ab}
\citation{Aaron:2010ab}
\citation{Aaron:2010ab}
\citation{Aaron:2010ab}
\newlabel{crsec}{{2}{9}}
\citation{Werner:2005jf,Pierog:2013ria}
\citation{Kalmykov:1993qe,Kalmykov:1997te}
\citation{Ostapchenko:2005nj,Ostapchenko:2010vb}
\citation{Engel:1992vf,Ahn:2009wx}
\citation{Collins:1977jy}
\citation{Gribov:1968fc}
\citation{Werner:2005jf}
\citation{Aaron:2011pe}
\citation{Pierog:2013ria}
\citation{Engel:1995yda}
\citation{ostapchenko1}
\citation{ostapchenko2}
\citation{Aaron:2011pe}
\citation{Aaron:2010ab}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.6}Systematic uncertainties}{11}}
\citation{Benecke:1969sh,Chou:1994dh}
\citation{Aaron:2011pe}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Results}{12}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Normalised cross sections as a function of $W$}{12}}
\newlabel{sec:resultW}{{3.1}{12}}
\citation{Aaron:2010ab}
\citation{Adriani:2011nf,Adriani:2012ap,Adriani:2012fz}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Normalised cross sections as a function of \relax \mathversion  {bold}$x_F$ and test of Feynman scaling}{13}}
\citation{ostapchenko2}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Summary}{15}}
\bibcite{Engel:1998hf}{1}
\bibcite{Bunyatyan:2009zz}{2}
\bibcite{Adloff:1998yg}{3}
\bibcite{Chekanov:2002pf}{4}
\bibcite{Chekanov:2007tv}{5}
\bibcite{Chekanov:2008tn}{6}
\bibcite{Aaron:2010ab}{7}
\bibcite{Aaron:2011pe}{8}
\bibcite{Benecke:1969sh}{9}
\bibcite{Chou:1994dh}{10}
\bibcite{Feynman:1969ej}{11}
\bibcite{Arnison:1982ed}{12}
\bibcite{Arnison:1982rm}{13}
\bibcite{Banner:1984wh}{14}
\bibcite{Bernard:1985kh}{15}
\bibcite{Alner:1986xu}{16}
\bibcite{Alner:1987wb}{17}
\bibcite{Alexopoulos:1988na}{18}
\bibcite{Abe:1989td}{19}
\bibcite{Aaron:2007ds}{20}
\bibcite{Abramowicz:2010rz}{21}
\bibcite{Pare:1989mr}{22}
\bibcite{Albrow:1973kj}{23}
\bibcite{Albrow:1973ee}{24}
\bibcite{Capiluppi:1973fz}{25}
\bibcite{Capiluppi:1974rt}{26}
\bibcite{Ohsawa:1992dj}{27}
\bibcite{Abt:1996hi}{28}
\bibcite{Abt:1996xv}{29}
\bibcite{Appuhn:1996na}{30}
\bibcite{Pitzl:2000wz}{31}
\bibcite{Andrieu:1993kh}{32}
\bibcite{Laycock:2012xg}{33}
\bibcite{Nicholls:1995di}{34}
\bibcite{Aaron:2012kn}{35}
\bibcite{Uraev}{36}
\bibcite{Peez:2003zd}{37}
\bibcite{Hellwig:2004yp}{38}
\bibcite{Adloff:1997sc}{39}
\bibcite{Brun:1978fy}{40}
\bibcite{Charchula:1994kf}{41}
\bibcite{Ingelman:1996mq}{42}
\bibcite{Lonnblad:1992tz}{43}
\bibcite{Andersson:1983ia}{44}
\bibcite{Sjostrand:1995iq}{45}
\bibcite{Kwiatkowski:1990es}{46}
\bibcite{Edin:1995gi}{47}
\bibcite{Aaron:2009kv}{48}
\bibcite{Jung:1993gf}{49}
\bibcite{Bishari:1972tx}{50}
\bibcite{Holtmann:1994rs}{51}
\bibcite{Kopeliovich:1996iw}{52}
\bibcite{Przybycien:1996zb}{53}
\bibcite{Szczurek:1997cw}{54}
\bibcite{Werner:2005jf}{55}
\bibcite{Pierog:2013ria}{56}
\bibcite{Kalmykov:1993qe}{57}
\bibcite{Kalmykov:1997te}{58}
\bibcite{Ostapchenko:2005nj}{59}
\bibcite{Ostapchenko:2010vb}{60}
\bibcite{Engel:1992vf}{61}
\bibcite{Ahn:2009wx}{62}
\bibcite{Collins:1977jy}{63}
\bibcite{Gribov:1968fc}{64}
\bibcite{Engel:1995yda}{65}
\bibcite{ostapchenko1}{66}
\bibcite{ostapchenko2}{67}
\bibcite{Adriani:2011nf}{68}
\bibcite{Adriani:2012ap}{69}
\bibcite{Adriani:2012fz}{70}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces  The fraction of DIS events with forward photons in the kinematic region given in Table\nobreakspace  {}1\hbox {}. For each measurement, the statistical ($\delta _{stat.}$), the total systematic ($\delta _{total\nobreakspace  {}sys.}$), the uncorrelated ($\delta _{uncorrel.sys.}$) systematic uncertainties and the bin-to-bin correlated systematic uncertainties due to the FNC absolute energy scale ($\delta _{E_{FNC}}$), the measurement of the particle impact position in the FNC ($\delta _{XY_{FNC}}$) and the model dependence of the data correction ($\delta _{model}$) are given. }}{19}}
\newlabel{tab:table1}{{2}{19}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces  The fraction of DIS events with forward neutrons in the kinematic region given in Table\nobreakspace  {}1\hbox {}. For each measurement, the statistical ($\delta _{stat.}$), the total systematic ($\delta _{total\nobreakspace  {}sys.}$), the uncorrelated ($\delta _{uncorrel.sys.}$) systematic uncertainties and the bin-to-bin correlated systematic uncertainties due to the FNC absolute energy scale ($\delta _{E_{FNC}}$), the measurement of the particle impact position in the FNC ($\delta _{XY_{FNC}}$) and the model dependence of the data correction ($\delta _{model}$) are given. }}{19}}
\newlabel{tab:table2}{{3}{19}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces  Normalised cross sections of forward photon production in DIS as a function of $x_F$. The kinematic phase space of the measurements is given in Table\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}1\hbox {}. For each measurement, the statistical ($\delta _{stat.}$), the total systematic ($\delta _{total\nobreakspace  {}sys.}$), the uncorrelated ($\delta _{uncorrel.sys.}$) systematic uncertainties and the bin-to-bin correlated systematic uncertainties due to the FNC absolute energy scale ($\delta _{E_{FNC}}$), the measurement of the particle impact position in the FNC ($\delta _{XY_{FNC}}$) and the model dependence of the data correction ($\delta _{model}$) are given. }}{20}}
\newlabel{tab:table3}{{4}{20}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces  Normalised cross sections of forward neutron production in DIS as a function of $x_F$. The kinematic phase space of the measurements is given in Table\nobreakspace  {}\nobreakspace  {}1\hbox {}. For each measurement, the statistical ($\delta _{stat.}$), the total systematic ($\delta _{total\nobreakspace  {}sys.}$), the uncorrelated ($\delta _{uncorrel.sys.}$) systematic uncertainties and the bin-to-bin correlated systematic uncertainties due to the FNC absolute energy scale ($\delta _{E_{FNC}}$), the measurement of the particle impact position in the FNC ($\delta _{XY_{FNC}}$) and the model dependence of the data correction ($\delta _{model}$) are given. }}{21}}
\newlabel{tab:table4}{{5}{21}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces  The fraction of DIS events with forward photons {\bf  (a)} and forward neutrons {\bf  (b)} as a function of $W$ in the kinematic region given in Table\nobreakspace  {}1\hbox {}. Also shown are the predictions of the LEPTO (solid line) and CDM (dashed line) MC models. In the case of forward neutron production, the predictions of RAPGAP-$\pi $ and the linear combinations of LEPTO and RAPGAP-$\pi $, as well as CDM and RAPGAP-$\pi $ are also shown. }}{22}}
\newlabel{figW}{{2}{22}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces  The fraction of DIS events with forward photons {\bf  (a)} and forward neutrons {\bf  (b)} as a function of $W$ in the kinematic region given in Table\nobreakspace  {}1\hbox {}. Also shown are the predictions of the cosmic ray hadronic interaction models SIBYLL\nobreakspace  {}2.1 (solid line), QGSJET\nobreakspace  {}01 (dashed line), QGSJET\nobreakspace  {}II-04 (dotted line) and EPOS\nobreakspace  {}LHC (dash-dotted line). }}{22}}
\newlabel{figWcos}{{3}{22}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces  Normalised cross sections of forward photon production in DIS as a function of $x_F$ in three $W$ intervals in the kinematic region given in Table\nobreakspace  {}1\hbox {}. The error bars show the total experimental uncertainty, calculated using the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. Also shown are the predictions of the LEPTO (solid line) and CDM (dashed line) MC models. }}{23}}
\newlabel{fig:xfgmc}{{4}{23}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces  Normalised cross sections of forward photon production in DIS as a function of $x_F$ in three $W$ intervals in the kinematic region given in Table\nobreakspace  {}1\hbox {}. The inner error bars show the statistical uncertainty, while the outer error bars show the total experimental uncertainty, calculated using the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. Also shown are the predictions of the cosmic ray hadronic interaction models SIBYLL\nobreakspace  {}2.1 (solid line), QGSJET\nobreakspace  {}01 (dashed line), QGSJET\nobreakspace  {}01\nobreakspace  {}(no\nobreakspace  {}mi) (dash-double dotted line), QGSJET\nobreakspace  {}II-04 (dotted line) and EPOS\nobreakspace  {}LHC (dash-dotted line). In the right column the ratios of the CR model predictions to the data are shown. }}{24}}
\newlabel{fig:xfgcos}{{5}{24}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces  Normalised cross sections of forward neutron production in DIS as a function of $x_F$ in three $W$ intervals in the kinematic region given in Table\nobreakspace  {}1\hbox {}. The inner error bars show the statistical uncertainty, while the outer error bars show the total experimental uncertainty, calculated using the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. Also shown are the predictions of CDM (dotted line), RAPGAP-$\pi $ (dashed line) and a linear combination of CDM and RAPGAP-$\pi $ predictions (solid line). }}{25}}
\newlabel{fig:xfn}{{6}{25}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces  Normalised cross sections of forward neutron production in DIS as a function of $x_F$ in three $W$ intervals in the kinematic region given in Table\nobreakspace  {}1\hbox {}. The inner error bars show the statistical uncertainty, while the outer error bars show the total experimental uncertainty, calculated using the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. Also shown are the predictions of the cosmic ray hadronic interaction models SIBYLL\nobreakspace  {}2.1 (solid line), QGSJET\nobreakspace  {}01 (dashed line), QGSJET\nobreakspace  {}01\nobreakspace  {}(no\nobreakspace  {}mi) (dash-double dotted line), QGSJET\nobreakspace  {}II-04 (dotted line) and EPOS\nobreakspace  {}LHC (dash-dotted line). In the right column the ratios of the CR model predictions to the data are shown. }}{26}}
\newlabel{fig:xfncos}{{7}{26}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces  Ratios of normalised cross sections of forward photon production in DIS corresponding to two different $W$ intervals, shown in Figure\nobreakspace  {}4\hbox {}, as a function of $x_F$: {\bf  (a)} ratio of the cross section in the $130<W<190$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval to the cross section in the $70<W<130$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval; {\bf  (b)} ratio of the cross section in the $190<W<245$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval to the cross section in the $70<W<130$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval. The kinematic phase space is defined in Table\nobreakspace  {}1\hbox {}. The error bars show the total experimental uncertainty, calculated using the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. Also shown are the predictions of the LEPTO (solid line) and CDM (dashed line) MC models. }}{27}}
\newlabel{fig:xfmcratio}{{8}{27}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces  Ratios of normalised cross sections of forward photon production in DIS corresponding to two different $W$ intervals, shown in Figure\nobreakspace  {}5\hbox {}, as a function of $x_F$: {\bf  (a)} ratio of the cross section in the $130<W<190$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval to the cross section in the $70<W<130$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval; {\bf  (b)} ratio of the cross section in the $190<W<245$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval to the cross section in the $70<W<130$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval. The kinematic phase space is defined in Table\nobreakspace  {}1\hbox {}. The error bars show the total experimental uncertainty, calculated using the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. Also shown are the predictions of the cosmic ray hadronic interaction models SIBYLL\nobreakspace  {}2.1 (solid line), QGSJET\nobreakspace  {}01 (dashed line), QGSJET\nobreakspace  {}II-04 (dotted line) and EPOS\nobreakspace  {}LHC (dash-dotted line). }}{28}}
\newlabel{fig:xfgcosratio}{{9}{28}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces  Ratios of normalised cross sections of forward neutron production in DIS corresponding to two different $W$ intervals, shown in Figure\nobreakspace  {}7\hbox {}, as a function of $x_F$: {\bf  (a)} ratio of the cross section in the $130<W<190$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval to the cross section in the $70<W<130$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval; {\bf  (b)} ratio of the cross section in the $190<W<245$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval to the cross section in the $70<W<130$\nobreakspace  {}GeV interval. The kinematic phase space is defined in Table\nobreakspace  {}1\hbox {}. The error bars show the total experimental uncertainty, calculated using the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic uncertainties. Also shown are the predictions of the cosmic ray hadronic interaction models SIBYLL\nobreakspace  {}2.1 (solid line), QGSJET\nobreakspace  {}01 (dashed line), QGSJET\nobreakspace  {}II-04 (dotted line) and EPOS\nobreakspace  {}LHC (dash-dotted line). }}{29}}
\newlabel{fig:xfnratio}{{10}{29}}