\relax 
\citation{pomeranchuk,goulianos}
\citation{trentadue}
\citation{fitb}
\citation{gribov,dokschitzer,altarelli}
\citation{collins}
\citation{rfact_1,rfact_2,rfact_3,fitb}
\citation{jetdiff_1,jetdiff_3,jetdiff_zeus}
\citation{jetdiff_2}
\citation{fitb}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{3}}
\citation{rapgap}
\citation{fitb}
\citation{llog}
\citation{lund}
\citation{pythia}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Kinematics}{4}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Leading order diagram for the production of dijets in diffractive DIS.}}{4}}
\newlabel{fig:feyn}{{1}{4}}
\newlabel{_kine_dis}{{1}{4}}
\newlabel{_kine_diff}{{2}{4}}
\newlabel{_kine_jet}{{3}{4}}
\citation{diffvm}
\citation{resgamma}
\citation{sasg2dfit}
\citation{heracles}
\citation{fitb}
\citation{cteq}
\citation{geant}
\citation{nlojetprog,nlojet}
\citation{dpdferr}
\citation{H1fastNLO,fastNLO,fnlo}
\citation{nlojetprog,nlojet}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Monte Carlo Models and Fixed Order QCD Calculations}{5}}
\newlabel{sec:model}{{3}{5}}
\citation{ariadne}
\citation{det_1}
\citation{lar}
\citation{testbeam_1,testbeam_2}
\citation{spac1,spac2}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Experimental Technique}{6}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.1}H1 detector}{6}}
\citation{qedclumi}
\citation{esigma}
\citation{peez:03,hellwig:04}
\citation{kogler}
\citation{kt}
\citation{fastjet}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}Reconstruction of observables}{7}}
\citation{mythesis}
\newlabel{_reco_xpom}{{5}{8}}
\newlabel{_reco_zpom}{{6}{8}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.3}Event selection}{8}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Summary of the extended analysis phase space and the phase space for the dijet cross sections measurements.}}{9}}
\newlabel{tab:ps}{{1}{9}}
\citation{unf_3}
\citation{unf_3}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.4}Corrections to the data}{10}}
\newlabel{subsec:data}{{4.4}{10}}
\newlabel{eq:unf}{{7}{10}}
\citation{kogler}
\citation{tslope}
\citation{qedclumi}
\citation{incldiff_lrg}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.5}Systematic uncertainties}{11}}
\citation{jetdiff_3}
\citation{jetdiff_2}
\citation{HighQ2Paper}
\citation{HighQ2Paper}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Results}{12}}
\citation{Beringer:1900zz,Bethke:2012jm}
\citation{Aaron:10:1,HighQ2Paper,Abramowicz:2012jz}
\citation{Abazov:2009nc,Abazov:2012lua}
\citation{Chatrchyan:2013txa,alps_cms}
\bibcite{pomeranchuk}{1}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Conclusions}{13}}
\bibcite{goulianos}{2}
\bibcite{trentadue}{3}
\bibcite{fitb}{4}
\bibcite{gribov}{5}
\bibcite{dokschitzer}{6}
\bibcite{altarelli}{7}
\bibcite{collins}{8}
\bibcite{rfact_1}{9}
\bibcite{rfact_2}{10}
\bibcite{rfact_3}{11}
\bibcite{jetdiff_1}{12}
\bibcite{jetdiff_3}{13}
\bibcite{jetdiff_zeus}{14}
\bibcite{jetdiff_2}{15}
\bibcite{rapgap}{16}
\bibcite{llog}{17}
\bibcite{lund}{18}
\bibcite{pythia}{19}
\bibcite{diffvm}{20}
\bibcite{resgamma}{21}
\bibcite{sasg2dfit}{22}
\bibcite{heracles}{23}
\bibcite{cteq}{24}
\bibcite{geant}{25}
\bibcite{nlojetprog}{26}
\bibcite{nlojet}{27}
\bibcite{dpdferr}{28}
\bibcite{H1fastNLO}{29}
\bibcite{fastNLO}{30}
\bibcite{fnlo}{31}
\bibcite{ariadne}{32}
\bibcite{det_1}{33}
\bibcite{lar}{34}
\bibcite{testbeam_1}{35}
\bibcite{testbeam_2}{36}
\bibcite{spac1}{37}
\bibcite{spac2}{38}
\bibcite{qedclumi}{39}
\bibcite{esigma}{40}
\bibcite{peez:03}{41}
\bibcite{hellwig:04}{42}
\bibcite{kogler}{43}
\bibcite{kt}{44}
\bibcite{fastjet}{45}
\bibcite{mythesis}{46}
\bibcite{unf_3}{47}
\bibcite{tslope}{48}
\bibcite{incldiff_lrg}{49}
\bibcite{HighQ2Paper}{50}
\bibcite{Beringer:1900zz}{51}
\bibcite{Bethke:2012jm}{52}
\bibcite{Aaron:10:1}{53}
\bibcite{Abramowicz:2012jz}{54}
\bibcite{Abazov:2009nc}{55}
\bibcite{Abazov:2012lua}{56}
\bibcite{Chatrchyan:2013txa}{57}
\bibcite{alps_cms}{58}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Diffractive DIS dijet cross section measured differentially as a function of $\ensuremath  {Q^2} $, $y$, $\qopname  \relax o{log}x_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}}$ and $z_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}}$. The statistical $\delta _{stat}$ and systematic $\delta _{sys}$ uncertainties are given together with the total uncertainty $\delta _{tot}$. The next 12 columns represent $+1\sigma $ shifts for the systematic error contributions from: electron polar angle measurement $\delta _{\theta }$, electron energy scale $\delta _{E}$, HFS energy scale $\delta _{HFS}$, model uncertainties $\delta _{\ensuremath  {Q^2} }$, $\delta _{x_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}}}$, $\delta _{\beta }$, $\delta _{p*_{T,1}}$, $\delta _{z_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}}}$, $\delta _{x_{dijet}}$, $\delta _{\Delta \eta *}$ and $\delta _{t}$ and the background normalisation uncertainty $\delta _{bgr}$. The global normalisation uncertainty of $7.8\%$ is not listed explicitly but is included in the total systematic uncertainty $\delta _{sys}$. The last two column show the correction factors for hadronisation and QED radiation, respectively. }}{17}}
\newlabel{tab:tab1}{{2}{17}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Diffractive DIS dijet cross section measured differentially as a function of $p^{\ast }_{T,1}$, $p^{\ast }_{T,2}$, $\delimiter "426830A p^{\ast }_{T}\delimiter "526930B $ and $\Delta \eta ^{\ast }$. The statistical $\delta _{stat}$ and systematic $\delta _{sys}$ uncertainties are given together with the total uncertainty $\delta _{tot}$. Further details are given in Table\nobreakspace  {}2\hbox {}. }}{18}}
\newlabel{tab:tab2}{{3}{18}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Diffractive DIS dijet cross section measured differentially as a function of $z_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}}$ and $\ensuremath  {Q^2} $. The statistical $\delta _{stat}$ and systematic $\delta _{sys}$ uncertainties are given together with the total uncertainty $\delta _{tot}$. Further details are given in Table\nobreakspace  {}2\hbox {}. }}{19}}
\newlabel{tab:tab3}{{4}{19}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Diffractive DIS dijet cross section measured differentially as a function of $p^{\ast }_{\rm  T,1}$ and $\ensuremath  {Q^2} $. The statistical $\delta _{stat}$ and systematic $\delta _{sys}$ uncertainties are given together with the total uncertainty $\delta _{tot.}$. Further details are given in Table\nobreakspace  {}2\hbox {}. }}{20}}
\newlabel{tab:tab5}{{5}{20}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Correlation coefficients between data points for the single-differential measurements in $\ensuremath  {Q^2} $, $y$, $x_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}}$ and $z_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}}$. The values are given in per cent.}}{21}}
\newlabel{tab:tabrho1}{{6}{21}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Correlation coefficients between data points for the single-differential measurements in $p^{\ast }_{\rm  T,1}$, $p^{\ast }_{\rm  T,2}$, $\delimiter "426830A p^{\ast }_{\rm  T}\delimiter "526930B $ and $\Delta \eta ^{\ast }$. The values are given in per cent.}}{22}}
\newlabel{tab:tabrho2}{{7}{22}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Correlation coefficients between data points for the double-differential measurement in $z_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}}$ and $\ensuremath  {Q^2} $. The values are given in per cent.}}{23}}
\newlabel{tab:tabrho3}{{8}{23}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces Correlation coefficients between data points for the double-differential measurement in $p^{\ast }_{\rm  T,1}$ and $\ensuremath  {Q^2} $. The values are given in per cent.}}{23}}
\newlabel{tab:tabrho5}{{9}{23}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Distributions of the kinematic quantities $\ensuremath  {Q^2} $, $p^{\ast }_{\rm  T,1}$, $x_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}}$ and $z_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}}$. The data are shown as black points compared to the sum of MC simulation estimates. The filled area shows the contribution of non-diffractive DIS, the dotted line shows the diffractive contribution with the elastically scattered proton added to the non-diffractive DIS and the dashed line displays the proton dissociation contribution added to the diffractive contribution with the elastically scattered proton and the non-diffractive DIS contribution. The sum of all contributions including the resolved photon processes is given by the full line. The MC is reweighted to the data. The ratio of data to the MC prediction is shown in the lower part of of the individual figures. }}{24}}
\newlabel{fig:figctr}{{2}{24}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Diffractive dijet differential cross section as a function of $\ensuremath  {Q^2} $ and $y$. The inner error bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties, while the outer error bars include the systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. The NLO QCD prediction based on the H12006 Fit-B DPDF set is displayed as a white line. The light shaded band indicates the uncertainty arising from hadronisation and the DPDF fit added in quadrature. The outer dark band shows the full theory uncertainty including the QCD scale uncertainty added in quadrature. The ratio of the single-differential cross section to the NLO prediction is shown in the lower part of the individual figures. }}{25}}
\newlabel{fig:fig1}{{3}{25}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Diffractive dijet differential cross section as a function of $\qopname  \relax o{log}x_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}}$ and $z_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}}$. The inner error bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties, while the outer error bars include the systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. Further details are given in figure\nobreakspace  {}3\hbox {}.}}{26}}
\newlabel{fig:fig2}{{4}{26}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Diffractive dijet differential cross section as a function of $p^{\ast }_{\rm  T,1}$ and $p^{\ast }_{\rm  T,2}$. The inner error bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties, while the outer error bars include the systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. Further details are given in figure\nobreakspace  {}3\hbox {}.}}{27}}
\newlabel{fig:fig3}{{5}{27}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Diffractive dijet differential cross section as a function of $\delimiter "426830A p^{\ast }_{\rm  T}\delimiter "526930B $ and $\Delta \eta ^{\ast }$. The inner error bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties, while the outer error bars include the systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. Further details are given in figure\nobreakspace  {}3\hbox {}.}}{28}}
\newlabel{fig:fig4}{{6}{28}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Double-differential cross section as a function of $z_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}}$ and $\ensuremath  {Q^2} $. The inner error bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties, while the outer error bars include the systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. Further details are given in figure\nobreakspace  {}3\hbox {}.}}{29}}
\newlabel{fig:fig5}{{7}{29}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Ratio of the double-differential cross section to the NLO prediction as a function of $z_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}}$ and $\ensuremath  {Q^2} $. The inner error bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties, while the outer error bars include the systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. Further details are given in figure\nobreakspace  {}3\hbox {}.}}{30}}
\newlabel{fig:fig6}{{8}{30}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces Double-differential cross section as a function of $p^{\ast }_{\rm  T,1}$ and $\ensuremath  {Q^2} $. The inner error bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties, while the outer error bars include the systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. Further details are given in figure\nobreakspace  {}3\hbox {}.}}{31}}
\newlabel{fig:fig9}{{9}{31}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces Ratio of the double-differential cross section to the NLO prediction as a function of $p^{\ast }_{\rm  T,1}$ and $\ensuremath  {Q^2} $. The inner error bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties, while the outer error bars include the systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. Further details are given in figure\nobreakspace  {}3\hbox {}.}}{32}}
\newlabel{fig:fig10}{{10}{32}}