\relax 
\citation{VanEsch:1999pi}
\citation{Astvatsatourov:2014dna}
\citation{Collins:1997sr}
\citation{Aktas:2006hy}
\citation{Chekanov:2004hy}
\citation{Chekanov:2002qm}
\citation{Aktas:2006up}
\citation{Aktas:2007bv}
\citation{Chekanov:2007aa}
\citation{Aaron:2011mp}
\citation{boris}
\citation{Affolder:2000vb}
\citation{Chatrchyan:2012vc}
\citation{Kaidalov:2001iz}
\citation{Kaidalov:2003gy}
\citation{Collins:2001ga}
\citation{Aaron:2010su}
\citation{Aktas:2007hn}
\citation{Chekanov:2007rh}
\citation{Aaron:2010su}
\citation{Aktas:2007hn}
\citation{Chekanov:2009aa}
\citation{Kaidalov:2003xf}
\citation{Kaidalov:2009fp}
\citation{Aktas:2007hn}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{3}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Kinematics}{4}}
\newlabel{eqn_dis}{{1}{4}}
\citation{vonWeizsacker:1934sx}
\citation{Williams:1934ad}
\citation{Gluck:1991ee}
\citation{Aurenche:2005da}
\citation{Aktas:2006hy}
\citation{Ingelman:1984ns}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Leading order diagrams of the direct a) and resolved b) diffractive dijet production.}}{5}}
\newlabel{fig_feyn_dir_res}{{1}{5}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Factorisation in Diffractive Dijet Production}{5}}
\citation{Aktas:2006hy}
\citation{Regge:1959mz}
\citation{Aktas:2006hy}
\citation{Frixione:1995ms}
\citation{Nagy:1998bb}
\citation{Nagy:2001xb}
\citation{Aktas:2007hn}
\citation{Klasen:1996it}
\citation{Klasen:2008ah}
\citation{Cerny:2008zz}
\citation{Chyla:2005qh}
\citation{Abt:1996hi}
\citation{Abt:1996xv}
\citation{Appuhn:1996na}
\citation{Pitzl:2000wz}
\citation{Becker:2007ms}
\newlabel{regge_fact}{{7}{6}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}NLO QCD Calculations}{6}}
\newlabel{nlo-text}{{4}{6}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Experimental Procedure}{6}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}The H1 Detector}{6}}
\citation{Appuhn:1996na}
\citation{Andrieu:1993kh}
\citation{Andrieu:1994yn}
\citation{Andrieu:1993tz}
\citation{Salek:2010ifa}
\citation{Abt:1996hi}
\citation{Aaron:2012kn}
\citation{Astvatsatourov:2014dna}
\citation{VanEsch:1999pi}
\citation{Astvatsatourov:2014dna}
\citation{Astvatsatourov:2014dna}
\citation{Hreus:2008zz}
\citation{Astvatsatourov:2014dna}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}Very Forward Proton Spectrometer}{7}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3}Kinematic Reconstruction}{7}}
\citation{Peez:2003zd}
\citation{Hellwig:2004yp}
\citation{Catani:1992zp}
\citation{Cacciari:2011ma}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Beam envelope \cite  {Astvatsatourov:2014dna} as a function of the distance $s$ to the H1 vertex in the $x$ projection, for the $p$ beam and diffractive protons at $x_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}=0.02$ and $|t|=0.01, 0.1$ and $0.5$ GeV$^2$. The locations of FPS/VFPS stations are indicated by the vertical lines.}}{8}}
\newlabel{fig_beam_env}{{2}{8}}
\citation{Adloff:1997sc}
\citation{Delvax:2010zz}
\citation{Astvatsatourov:2014dna}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {5.3.1}DIS}{9}}
\newlabel{yq2_weighted}{{13}{9}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {5.3.2}Photoproduction}{9}}
\newlabel{y_had}{{15}{9}}
\citation{Astvatsatourov:2014dna}
\citation{Glazov:2010zza}
\citation{Klasen:1996b}
\citation{Frixione:1997a}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.4}Event Selection}{10}}
\newlabel{sec_event_selection}{{5.4}{10}}
\citation{Brun:1987ma}
\citation{Jung:1993gf}
\citation{Andersson:1983ia}
\citation{Sjostrand:1995iq}
\citation{Aktas:2006hy}
\citation{Gluck:1991ee}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Phase space of the diffractive dijet VFPS measurement for photoproduction and deep-inelastic scattering.}}{11}}
\newlabel{tab_cuts}{{1}{11}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.5}Monte Carlo Simulations}{11}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {5.5.1}Correction to the Data}{11}}
\citation{Aaron:2010su}
\citation{Aaron:2010aa}
\citation{Aktas:2006hy}
\citation{doi:1686351}
\citation{tikhonov}
\citation{Aaron:2011mp}
\citation{boris}
\citation{daniel}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {5.5.2}Correction to Theoretical Models}{12}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.6}Cross Section Measurement}{12}}
\newlabel{sec_creoss_section}{{5.6}{12}}
\citation{doi:1686351}
\citation{Astvatsatourov:2014dna}
\citation{Schutte:1987qn}
\citation{Astvatsatourov:2014dna}
\citation{Salek:2010ifa}
\newlabel{eq_unf}{{19}{13}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.7}Systematic Uncertainties of the Measured Cross Section}{13}}
\citation{Astvatsatourov:2014dna}
\citation{Astvatsatourov:2014dna}
\citation{Aaron:2012kn}
\citation{boris}
\citation{Aktas:2007bv}
\citation{Chekanov:2007aa}
\citation{Aaron:2011mp}
\citation{boris}
\citation{Aaron:2010su}
\citation{Aktas:2007hn}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Results}{14}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.1}Integrated Photoproduction and DIS Cross Sections}{14}}
\citation{sedlak}
\citation{highertwist}
\citation{boris}
\citation{Aaron:2010su}
\citation{Aktas:2007hn}
\citation{Aurenche:2005da}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Integrated $e^{+}p$ diffractive dijet cross sections in $\gamma p$ and DIS compared to NLO QCD calculations using the H12006 Fit-B DPDF set. The measured cross sections are gresented with statistical and systematical uncertainties. For the theoretical predictions the uncertainties from scale variations, from the H12006 Fit-B DPDFs and from the hadronisation corretions are given. The predictions from RAPGAP are also shown. The ratios data/NLO are given in the last row.}}{15}}
\newlabel{tab_xsectot}{{2}{15}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.2}Diffractive Dijet Production in DIS}{15}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.3}Diffractive Dijet Production in Photoproduction}{15}}
\newlabel{sec_dpho_results}{{6.3}{15}}
\citation{Aaron:2010su}
\citation{Aktas:2007hn}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.4}Comparison of Dijet Cross Sections in Diffractive Photoproduction and DIS}{16}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Ratio of integrated $e^{+}p$ diffractive dijet cross sections for $Q^2<2\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}\text  {GeV}^2$ (photoproduction) to $Q^2>4\tmspace  +\thinmuskip {.1667em}\text  {GeV}^2$ (DIS). Listed are the ratios for data and for the NLO calculation including two variants. The data and NLO uncertainties are indicated. The double-ratio of data to NLO and its uncertainties are also given.}}{17}}
\newlabel{tab_xsecratio}{{3}{17}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Summary}{17}}
\bibstyle{utcaps_new}
\bibcite{VanEsch:1999pi}{{1}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Astvatsatourov:2014dna}{{2}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Collins:1997sr}{{3}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Aktas:2006hy}{{4}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Chekanov:2004hy}{{5}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Chekanov:2002qm}{{6}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Aktas:2006up}{{7}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Aktas:2007bv}{{8}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Chekanov:2007aa}{{9}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Aaron:2011mp}{{10}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{boris}{{11}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Affolder:2000vb}{{12}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Chatrchyan:2012vc}{{13}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Kaidalov:2001iz}{{14}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Kaidalov:2003gy}{{15}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Collins:2001ga}{{16}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Aaron:2010su}{{17}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Aktas:2007hn}{{18}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Chekanov:2007rh}{{19}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Chekanov:2009aa}{{20}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Kaidalov:2003xf}{{21}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Kaidalov:2009fp}{{22}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{vonWeizsacker:1934sx}{{23}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Williams:1934ad}{{24}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Gluck:1991ee}{{25}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Aurenche:2005da}{{26}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Ingelman:1984ns}{{27}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Regge:1959mz}{{28}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Frixione:1995ms}{{29}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Nagy:1998bb}{{30}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Nagy:2001xb}{{31}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Klasen:1996it}{{32}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Klasen:2008ah}{{33}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Cerny:2008zz}{{34}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Chyla:2005qh}{{35}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Abt:1996hi}{{36}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Abt:1996xv}{{37}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Appuhn:1996na}{{38}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Pitzl:2000wz}{{39}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Becker:2007ms}{{40}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Andrieu:1993kh}{{41}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Andrieu:1994yn}{{42}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Andrieu:1993tz}{{43}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Salek:2010ifa}{{44}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Aaron:2012kn}{{45}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Hreus:2008zz}{{46}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Peez:2003zd}{{47}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Hellwig:2004yp}{{48}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Catani:1992zp}{{49}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Cacciari:2011ma}{{50}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Adloff:1997sc}{{51}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Delvax:2010zz}{{52}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Glazov:2010zza}{{53}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Klasen:1996b}{{54}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Frixione:1997a}{{55}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Brun:1987ma}{{56}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Jung:1993gf}{{57}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Andersson:1983ia}{{58}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Sjostrand:1995iq}{{59}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Aaron:2010aa}{{60}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{doi:1686351}{{61}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{tikhonov}{{62}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{daniel}{{63}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{Schutte:1987qn}{{64}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{sedlak}{{65}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{highertwist}{{66}{}{{}}{{}}}
\newlabel{RF1}{{7}{22}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Integrated cross section and bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections as a function of the variables $z_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$, $x_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$, $y$ and $Q^2$ for diffractive dijet DIS in the phase space detailed in table 1\hbox {}. For each data point, the statistical ($\delta _{\text  {stat}}$) and systematic ($\delta _{\text  {syst}}$) uncertainties and the corresponding correlation coefficients ($\rho _{\text  {stat}}$, $\rho _{\text  {syst}}$) are given. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta _{\text  {hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the radiative corrections ($1+\delta _{\text  {rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.}}{22}}
\newlabel{tab_DisXsec1}{{4}{22}}
\newlabel{RF2}{{7}{23}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Bin averaged hadron level differential cross sections for diffractive dijet DIS as a function of the variables $E_T^{*\text  {jet1}}$, $M_X$, $\delimiter "026A30C \Delta \eta ^{\text  {jets}}\delimiter "026A30C $ and $\delimiter "426830A \eta ^{\text  {jets}}\delimiter "526930B $ in the phase space detailed in table 1\hbox {}. For each data point, the statistical ($\delta _{\text  {stat}}$) and systematic ($\delta _{\text  {syst}}$) uncertainties and the corresponding correlation coefficients ($\rho _{\text  {stat}}$, $\rho _{\text  {syst}}$) are given. The hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta _{\text  {hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations and the the radiative corrections ($1+\delta _{\text  {rad}}$) are also listed. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.}}{23}}
\newlabel{tab_DisXsec2}{{5}{23}}
\newlabel{RF3}{{7}{24}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Integrated diffractive dijet $ep$ cross section and bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections as a function of the variables $z_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$, $x_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$, $y$ and $x_\gamma $ for the dijet photoproduction kinematic range in the phase space detailed in table 1\hbox {}. For each data point, the statistical ($\delta _{\text  {stat}}$) and systematic ($\delta _{\text  {syst}}$) uncertainties, the corresponding correlation coefficients ($\rho _{\text  {stat}}$, $\rho _{\text  {syst}}$) and the hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta _{\text  {hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.}}{24}}
\newlabel{tab_PhpXsec1}{{6}{24}}
\newlabel{RF4}{{7}{25}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Bin averaged hadron level differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections in the photoproduction kinematic range as a function of the variables $E_T^{*\text  {jet1}}$, $M_X$, $\delimiter "026A30C \Delta \eta ^{\text  {jets}}\delimiter "026A30C $ and $\delimiter "426830A \eta ^{\text  {jets}}\delimiter "526930B $ in the phase space detailed in table 1\hbox {}. For each data point, the statistical ($\delta _{\text  {stat}}$) and systematic ($\delta _{\text  {syst}}$) uncertainties, the corresponding coefficients ($\rho _{\text  {stat}}$, $\rho _{\text  {syst}}$) and the hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta _{\text  {hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not included in the table.}}{25}}
\newlabel{tab_PhpXsec2}{{7}{25}}
\newlabel{RF5}{{7}{26}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Ratios of differential diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections, measured in photoproduction, to measurements in DIS as a function of the variables $\delimiter "026A30C \Delta \eta ^{\text  {jets}}\delimiter "026A30C $, $y$, $z_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$ and $E_T^{*\text  {jet1}}$ in the phase space detailed in table 1\hbox {}. For each data point, the statistical ($\delta _{\text  {stat}}$) and systematic ($\delta _{\text  {syst}}$) uncertainties, the corresponding correlation coefficients ($\rho _{\text  {stat}}$, $\rho _{\text  {syst}}$) and the hadronisation correction factors ($1+\delta _{\text  {hadr}}$) applied to the NLO calculations are given. }}{26}}
\newlabel{tab_xsecRatio}{{8}{26}}
\global\NAT@numberstrue
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Comparison of the photoproduction data (dots) and DIS data (triangles) with the reweighted RAPGAP MC simulation (solid line) as a function of coordinates $x$ and $y$ in VFPS, $x_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$, $Q^2$, $E_T^{*\@mathrm {jet1}}$ and $\delimiter "426830A \eta ^{\@mathrm {jets}}\delimiter "526930B $. The systematic uncertainties are shown as bands on the histograms. For better visibility the $\delimiter "426830A \eta ^{\@mathrm {jets}}\delimiter "526930B $ DIS distribution is multiplied by a factor 3. }}{27}}
\newlabel{fig_control_plots}{{3}{27}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Diffractive dijet DIS cross sections differential in $z_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}}$, $x_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}}$, $y$ and $Q^2$. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors. The outer error bars indicate the statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not shown. NLO QCD predictions based on the H12006 Fit-B DPDF set, corrected to the level of stable hadrons, are shown as a white line. They are scaled by a factor $0.83$ to account for contributions from proton-dissociation which are present in the DPDF fit but not in the data. The inner, light shaded band indicates the size of the DPDF uncertainties and hadronisation corrections added in quadrature. The outer, dark shaded band indicates the total NLO uncertainty, also including scale variations by a factor of $0.5$ to $2$. For each variable, the cross section is shown in the upper panel, whereas the ratio to the NLO prediction is shown in the lower panel. }}{28}}
\newlabel{fig_DisXsec1}{{4}{28}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Diffractive dijet DIS cross sections differential in $E_T^{*\@mathrm {jet1}}$, $M_X$, $|\Delta \eta ^{\@mathrm {jets}}|$ and $\delimiter "426830A \eta ^{\@mathrm {jets}}\delimiter "526930B $. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors. The outer error bars indicate the statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature. Further details are given in the caption of figure 4\hbox {}. }}{29}}
\newlabel{fig_DisXsec2}{{5}{29}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections in the photoproduction kinematic range differential in $z_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}}$, $x_{{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}}$, $y$ and $x_{\gamma }$. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors. The outer error bars indicate the statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature. The overall normalisation uncertainty of $6\%$ is not shown. NLO QCD predictions based on the H12006 Fit-B DPDF set and the GRV $\gamma $-PDF set, corrected to the level of stable hadrons, are shown as a white line. They are scaled by a factor $0.83$ to account for contributions from proton-dissociation which are present in the DPDF fit but not in the data. The inner, light shaded band indicates the size of the DPDF uncertainties and hadronisation corrections added in quadrature. The outer, dark shaded band indicates the total NLO uncertainty, also including scale variations by a factor of $0.5$ to $2$. A variant of the NLO calculation using the AFG $\gamma $-PDF set is shown as a dashed line. For each variable, the cross section is shown in the upper panel, whereas the ratio to the NLO prediction is shown in the lower panel. }}{30}}
\newlabel{fig_PhpXsec1}{{6}{30}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Diffractive dijet $ep$ cross sections in the photoproduction kinematic range differential in $E_T^{*\@mathrm {jet1}}$, $M_X$, $|\Delta \eta ^{\@mathrm {jets}}|$ and $\delimiter "426830A \eta ^{\@mathrm {jets}}\delimiter "526930B $. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors. The outer error bars indicate the statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature. Further details are given in the caption of figure 6\hbox {}. }}{31}}
\newlabel{fig_PhpXsec2}{{7}{31}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Diffractive dijet cross sections in the $\gamma p$- and in the DIS regime normalised to the NLO calculation as a function of the photon virtuality $Q^2$. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors. The outer error bars indicate the statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature. The data points are displayed at the geometrical bin centre. The NLO QCD predictions are based on the H12006 Fit-B DPDF set and, in case of photoproduction, on the GRV $\gamma $-PDF set, corrected to the level of stable hadrons. They are scaled by a factor $0.83$ to account for contributions from proton-dissociation which are present in the DPDF fit but not in the data. The inner, light shaded band indicates the size of the DPDF uncertainties and hadronisation corrections added in quadrature. The outer, dark shaded band indicates the total NLO uncertainty, also including scale variations by a factor of $0.5$ to $2$. Also shown is the ratio of the RAPGAP MC to the NLO prediction. }}{32}}
\newlabel{fig_DisPhpQ2}{{8}{32}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces Diffractive dijet DIS and photoproduction cross sections normalised to the NLO calculation. Also shown is the double ratio of photoproduction to DIS cross sections, normalised to the corresponding ratio of NLO predictions. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors. The outer error bars indicate the statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature. The NLO QCD predictions are based on the H12006 Fit-B DPDF set and GRV $\gamma $-PDF, corrected to the level of stable hadrons. They are scaled by a factor $0.83$ to account for contributions from proton-dissociation which are present in the DPDF fit but not in the data. The inner, light shaded band indicates the size of the DPDF uncertainties and hadronisation corrections added in quadrature. The outer, dark shaded band indicates the total NLO uncertainty, also including scale variations by a factor of $0.5$ to $2$. Variants of the NLO calculation, normalised to the default NLO prediction, are also shown: the effect of using the AFG $\gamma $-PDF parametrisation is studied in photoproduction. An alternative functional form of the scale is studied both in DIS and in photoproduction. }}{33}}
\newlabel{fig_DisPhpTotal}{{9}{33}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces Ratios of diffractive dijet photoproduction to DIS cross sections differential in $\delimiter "026A30C \Delta \eta \delimiter "026A30C $ and $y$. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors. The outer error bars indicate the statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature. The NLO QCD predictions are based on the H12006 Fit-B DPDF set and GRV $\gamma $-PDF, corrected to the level of stable hadrons. They are scaled by a factor $0.83$ to account for contributions from proton-dissociation which are present in the DPDF fit but not in the data. The inner, light shaded band indicates the size of the DPDF uncertainties and hadronisation corrections added in quadrature. The outer, dark shaded band indicates the total NLO uncertainty, also including scale variations by a factor of $0.5$ to $2$. Variants of the NLO calculation, normalised to the default calculation, are also shown. An alternative functional form of the scale is studied differential in $\delimiter "026A30C \Delta \eta \delimiter "026A30C $. The effect of using the AFG $\gamma $-PDF parametrisation is studied differential in $y$. }}{34}}
\newlabel{fig_DisPhpRatio1}{{10}{34}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces Ratios of diffractive dijet photoproduction to DIS cross sections differential in $z_{I\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace  -\thinmuskip {.1667em}P}$ and $E_T^{*\@mathrm {jet1}}$. The inner error bars represent the statistical errors. The outer error bars indicate the statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature. The NLO QCD predictions are based on the H12006 Fit-B DPDF set and GRV $\gamma $-PDF, corrected to the level of stable hadrons. They are scaled by a factor $0.83$ to account for contributions from proton-dissociation which are present in the DPDF fit but not in the data. The inner, light shaded band indicates the size of the DPDF uncertainties and hadronisation corrections added in quadrature. The outer, dark shaded band indicates the total NLO uncertainty, also including scale variations by a factor of $0.5$ to $2$. A variant of the NLO calculation using the AFG $\gamma $-PDF is shown as a dashed line. }}{35}}
\newlabel{fig_DisPhpRatio2}{{11}{35}}