\relax 
\citation{rpvhera}
\citation{gmsbtheo}
\citation{wein}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Theoretical Framework}{1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.1}Neutralino Production}{1}}
\newlabel{eq:rpv}{{1}{1}}
\citation{standardnotation}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2}Neutralino Decay}{2}}
\newlabel{eq:gravmass}{{2}{2}}
\newlabel{eq:lgr}{{3}{2}}
\newlabel{eq:gold1/2}{{4}{2}}
\newlabel{eq:neudecay}{{5}{2}}
\citation{Abt:1997hi}
\citation{Andrieu:1993kh}
\citation{Andrieu:1994yn,Andrieu}
\citation{iron}
\citation{DJANGO}
\citation{CDM}
\citation{ARIADNE}
\citation{JETSET74}
\citation{CTEQ}
\citation{PYTHIA}
\citation{JETSET74}
\citation{SFGRVGLO}
\citation{EPVEC}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Neutralino production via selectron exchange, decaying into a gravitino and a photon.}}{3}}
\newlabel{fig:feyn}{{1}{3}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}The H1 Detector}{3}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Monte Carlo Generation}{3}}
\citation{SUSYGEN}
\citation{DGLAP}
\citation{PYTHIA,JETSET74}
\citation{CTEQ}
\citation{SUSPECT}
\citation{H1F2PAPER}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Event Selection}{4}}
\newlabel{seq:selection}{{5}{4}}
\citation{excneu}
\citation{wnlo}
\citation{Junk:1999kv}
\citation{Dimopoulos:1996yq,Ambrosanio:1997rv,Giudice:1998bp}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Systematic Uncertainties}{5}}
\citation{Acosta:2002eq}
\citation{Dimopoulos:1996yq}
\citation{SUSYGEN}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}GMSB Model Dependent Interpretations}{6}}
\citation{Abbiendi:2000bd}
\citation{mohapatra}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {8}Conclusions}{7}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Excluded region at the $95\%$ confidence level in the plane spanned by selectron and neutralino mass for different values of $\lambda '_{1j1} =$ 0.5 (dark red), 1.0 (red), 1.5 (light red) ($j=1,2$). Within the considered GMSB scenario, the region in the upper left rectangle (dark grey) is theoretically not accessible. The region in the lower right rectangle (light grey) is not analyzed because the neutralino is required to be the next-to-lightest supersymmetric particle.}}{8}}
\newlabel{fig:mselmne}{{2}{8}}
\bibcite{rpvhera}{1}
\bibcite{gmsbtheo}{2}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Upper limit at the $95\%$ confidence level on $R_P$-violating\ couplings $\lambda '_{1j1}$ ($j=1,2$) as a function of the neutralino mass for a difference between selectron and neutralino mass of 1 GeV (solid, dark), 5 GeV (dashed), 10 GeV (dashed-dotted) and 15 GeV (solid, light).}}{9}}
\newlabel{fig:lambda}{{3}{9}}
\bibcite{wein}{3}
\bibcite{standardnotation}{4}
\bibcite{Abt:1997hi}{5}
\bibcite{Andrieu:1993kh}{6}
\bibcite{Andrieu:1994yn}{7}
\bibcite{Andrieu}{8}
\bibcite{iron}{9}
\bibcite{DJANGO}{10}
\bibcite{CDM}{11}
\bibcite{ARIADNE}{12}
\bibcite{JETSET74}{13}
\bibcite{CTEQ}{14}
\bibcite{PYTHIA}{15}
\bibcite{SFGRVGLO}{16}
\bibcite{EPVEC}{17}
\bibcite{SUSYGEN}{18}
\bibcite{DGLAP}{19}
\bibcite{SUSPECT}{20}
\bibcite{H1F2PAPER}{21}
\bibcite{excneu}{22}
\bibcite{wnlo}{23}
\bibcite{Junk:1999kv}{24}
\bibcite{Dimopoulos:1996yq}{25}
\bibcite{Ambrosanio:1997rv}{26}
\bibcite{Giudice:1998bp}{27}
\bibcite{Acosta:2002eq}{28}
\bibcite{Abbiendi:2000bd}{29}
\bibcite{mohapatra}{30}